Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Career Institute: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep |
curation - removing this as the malformed link added by Tchaliburton was corrected by TrendSPLEND, after Anthony Appleyard had pointed out the correction |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete'''. At best it still fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:ORG]]. At worst a violation of [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. [[User:Tchaliburton|T.C.Haliburton]]<sup>[[User talk:Tchaliburton|talk nerdy to me]]</sup> 04:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. At best it still fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:ORG]]. At worst a violation of [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. [[User:Tchaliburton|T.C.Haliburton]]<sup>[[User talk:Tchaliburton|talk nerdy to me]]</sup> 04:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
*Link should be [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 04:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
*The article should not be deleted, as it is significantly covered in media. Also, the institute is ranked no.1 in coaching institutes of [[Kota, Rajasthan]], the coaching capital of India. Other cram schools in city such as [[Vibrant Academy]], [[Bansal Classes]] also have their articles (which are below in ranking than Allen), so this article is surely liable to '''NOT BE DELETED''' and be '''KEEP''' on Wikipedia. In my view, it does not seem to be promotional but provide general information through reliable sources.[[User:TrendSPLEND|TrendSPLEND]] ([[User talk:TrendSPLEND|talk]]) 06:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
*The article should not be deleted, as it is significantly covered in media. Also, the institute is ranked no.1 in coaching institutes of [[Kota, Rajasthan]], the coaching capital of India. Other cram schools in city such as [[Vibrant Academy]], [[Bansal Classes]] also have their articles (which are below in ranking than Allen), so this article is surely liable to '''NOT BE DELETED''' and be '''KEEP''' on Wikipedia. In my view, it does not seem to be promotional but provide general information through reliable sources.[[User:TrendSPLEND|TrendSPLEND]] ([[User talk:TrendSPLEND|talk]]) 06:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 11:47, 27 March 2016
Allen Career Institute
- Allen Career Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
@103.6.159.93: queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hard to say without Indian sources, but from a general look it seems legitimate enough. I would say KEEP Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 04:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. At best it still fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. At worst a violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 04:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- The article should not be deleted, as it is significantly covered in media. Also, the institute is ranked no.1 in coaching institutes of Kota, Rajasthan, the coaching capital of India. Other cram schools in city such as Vibrant Academy, Bansal Classes also have their articles (which are below in ranking than Allen), so this article is surely liable to NOT BE DELETED and be KEEP on Wikipedia. In my view, it does not seem to be promotional but provide general information through reliable sources.TrendSPLEND (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Notable organisation, given the number of secondary sources available. There is also a firm AfD precedence at keeping articles on Indian coaching institutes (AfD 1, AfD 2, AfD 3, AfD 4, AfD 5). A bit of a promotional tone is not a reason for deletion. Deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. 103.6.159.91 (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)