Jump to content

Talk:Machmeter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Moeburn - "→‎True airspeed: new section"
Moeburn (talk | contribs)
Line 3: Line 3:
== True airspeed ==
== True airspeed ==


Doesn't a mach number represent ''indicated'' airspeed over speed of sound? Seeing as how speed of sound is already a function of pressure, by calling it "true airspeed over speed of sound", you're effectively dividing by static pressure twice. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Moeburn|Moeburn]] ([[User talk:Moeburn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Moeburn|contribs]]) 03:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Doesn't a mach number represent ''indicated'' airspeed over speed of sound? Seeing as how speed of sound is already a function of pressure, and true airspeed is also a function of pressure, by calling it "true airspeed over speed of sound", you're effectively dividing by static pressure twice. [[User:Moeburn|moeburn]] ([[User talk:Moeburn|talk]]) 03:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:37, 29 March 2016

WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

True airspeed

Doesn't a mach number represent indicated airspeed over speed of sound? Seeing as how speed of sound is already a function of pressure, and true airspeed is also a function of pressure, by calling it "true airspeed over speed of sound", you're effectively dividing by static pressure twice. moeburn (talk) 03:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]