Jump to content

User talk:Dean1997: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 70: Line 70:


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> You were warned on March 2 against re-adding a romantic partner to this article unless you got a consensus first on the talk page. The AN3 case was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive309#Dean1997_reported_by_User:Rebbing_.28Result:_Warned.29 here]. Yet you did this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cara_Delevingne&diff=prev&oldid=714165241 one more time] on April 8. This is so important to you you are willing to engage in socking, but you won't open a discussion at [[Talk:Cara Delevingne]]? This block may be lifted if you will agree to behave better. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> You were warned on March 2 against re-adding a romantic partner to this article unless you got a consensus first on the talk page. The AN3 case was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive309#Dean1997_reported_by_User:Rebbing_.28Result:_Warned.29 here]. Yet you did this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cara_Delevingne&diff=prev&oldid=714165241 one more time] on April 8. This is so important to you you are willing to engage in socking, but you won't open a discussion at [[Talk:Cara Delevingne]]? This block may be lifted if you will agree to behave better. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
::As I noted earlier on this talk page, you are trying to add a "partner" section to an infobox that doesn't have it. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cara_Delevingne&diff=prev&oldid=714165241 Here] is the last time you added it. If you scroll down, you will see that your addition DOES NOT SHOW. By ignoring this talk page, you earned a block for adding material no reader ever saw. - <span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span><sup>[[User talk:SummerPhDv2.0|v2.0]]</sup> 11:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:56, 8 April 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Dean1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St. Vincent (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 8 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St. Vincent (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox musical artist
  • | partner = [[Cara Delevingne,[[ 2014-Present]] {{cite web|url=http://http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St. Vincent (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | origin = [[Dallas, Texas|Dallas]], ]]Texas]], U.S.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Musical artist does not have a "partner" parameter. It will not display. Please stop adding it. Thanks. - SummerPhDv2.0 02:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Vincent (musician). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Emotionalllama (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Vincent (musician), you may be blocked from editing. You have already been asked to stop adding the nonexistent partner parameter to the infobox. So stop. Mirokado (talk) 02:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cara Delevingne. You really must stop restoring material that has been removed as unacceptable. Please read bold, revert, discuss and open a section on the article talk page if you still think the content should be added. If you continue to restore deleted material, or make other disruptive edits, you will be blocked. Mirokado (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have again restored removed content instead of going to the talk page. As I said in the previous message, you must stop doing this or you are likely to be blocked. One more try to explain this... Open a discussion on the article talk page if you wish, but you must stop the following disruptive behaviour:

  • edit warring: persistently restoring removed material instead of discussing on the article talk page, see WP:BRD
  • violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people by adding contentious unsourced material, see WP:BLP and the infobox documentation about the partner field and life partner. It is OK to mention St Vincent in the article body with the current source, as is already the case, but this information does not belong in the infobox.

--Mirokado (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dean1997 reported by User:Rebbing (Result: ). Thank you.  Rebbing  talk  02:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dean1997. Per the result of this report, you are warned to get consensus on the article talk page before trying yet again to add information to Cara Delevingne's article about who she is partnered with. Details of the complaint may be seen at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Dean1997 reported by User:Rebbing (Result: Warned). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Long term warring at Cara Delevingne

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You were warned on March 2 against re-adding a romantic partner to this article unless you got a consensus first on the talk page. The AN3 case was here. Yet you did this one more time on April 8. This is so important to you you are willing to engage in socking, but you won't open a discussion at Talk:Cara Delevingne? This block may be lifted if you will agree to behave better. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted earlier on this talk page, you are trying to add a "partner" section to an infobox that doesn't have it. Here is the last time you added it. If you scroll down, you will see that your addition DOES NOT SHOW. By ignoring this talk page, you earned a block for adding material no reader ever saw. - SummerPhDv2.0 11:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]