Talk:Innateness hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
rating |
just a thought |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{philosophy|language=yes|importance=mid|class=start}} |
{{philosophy|language=yes|importance=mid|class=start}} |
||
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=start|importance=|philosophy=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=start|importance=|philosophy=yes}} |
||
==Citation please= |
|||
for "This hypothesis supports linguistic nativism and was first proposed by Noam Chomsky." |
|||
As far as I can tell the expression 'innateness hypothesis' was introduced by Hilary Putnam... in 1967. |
|||
==[Untitled]== |
==[Untitled]== |
Revision as of 22:40, 10 April 2016
Philosophy: Language Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Linguistics: Philosophy of language Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
=Citation please
for "This hypothesis supports linguistic nativism and was first proposed by Noam Chomsky." As far as I can tell the expression 'innateness hypothesis' was introduced by Hilary Putnam... in 1967.
[Untitled]
Hello, a group of students from Linguistic & Multilingual Studies in NTU are editing this page. Please give us your kind feedback.
Brief Review
My students revised this page for a course (HG2052: Language, Technology and the Internet) and I am adding a couple of comments as part of the final review. Francis Bond (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- overall the page is greatly improved, with well-cited additions
- the prose is a bit choppy and repetitive
- many small mis-wordings/spacings
- it would be good to merge identical references
- the page has captured the fact that there is still much disagreement about this
- so it is neutral
- it is also broad, stable and verifiable
- I think it fails a little to be well-written and illustrated