Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biscuittin: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Endorsing for checkuser attention
Line 3: Line 3:
{{SPIpriorcases}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}
===18 April 2016===
===18 April 2016===
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}
{{SPI case status|endorse}}


;Suspected sockpuppets
;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 36: Line 36:


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
*{{Endorse}} - Most of them are blocked (except the last) for block evasion and such. Recommend sleeper check. <span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif">[[User:QEDK|<span style="color:#96f">QEDK</span>]] <small>([[User talk:QEDK|<span style="color:#c3f">T</span>]] &#9749; [[Special:Contributions/QEDK|<span style="color:#f90">C</span>]])</small></span> 19:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 19:23, 18 April 2016

Biscuittin

Biscuittin (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

18 April 2016

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

Suspected sockpuppets


These socks were originally listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Renameduser024 but that case has turned out to have what appears to be two separate Masters, so I am splitting this out into this case, and striking or hatting discussion of this sock-nest at that SPI. Sorry if I have done this incorrectly. Please note that all of the socks listed above, with the exception of the last (Tedsmobilepulpit), have been blocked already. The last is the subject of Sock #6 ANI filing. Other ANI filings have been: Socks #4 and #5, Sock #3, Sock #2, and the first ANI filing i made. I keep bringing these to ANI as they are creating acute disruption in discussions I am having with conflicted or possibly conflicted editors, and they keep being blocked; don't know if it is possible to stem the tide. The sock calls itself WURT.

This is a self-acknowledged SOCK that has apparently been indeffed and has declared it it out to "get" me, in the name of some notion they have of reform, per this and this and this and this and many others. See also this now-deleted page, where they logged their socks as they created them: User:MagneticMarcella/sandbox.

User:QuackGuru wrote here that based on writing style and what they are saying, the actual Master worked on this essay: User:QuackGuru/Reform of Wikipedia. I reviewed the history of that, and the most likely seems to me, to be User:Biscuittin (the essay actually started out as one of their Userpages, see User:Biscuittin/Reform of Wikipedia) If that turns out to be accurate, I suggest we consider adding Biscuittin to the list at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse. Jytdog (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Biscuittin&oldid=715922133"