User talk:Texas6634

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chili dog. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 21:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

I wished you hadn't blocked me I'm very sorry and if you unblock I'll be good and won't vandalize again--Texas6634 (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Can you give an example of a constructive edit that you would make if unblocked? Be specific, down to sources you'd use. —C.Fred (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

@C.Fred:Here's and example, don't know if it's a good one but I'll try. I would focus on articles that I'm interested in like TV Shows and/or TV Networks and I would use good sources for reliable information on the article that I'm editing whether it's New York Post, Deadline Hollywood etc: So being constructive on Wikipedia and doing my best to see that the articles that fit my interests are reliable and up to date is something I'm wiling to do on Wikipedia. And Vandalizing Wikipedia is not my thing and I have total remorse for doing that.--Texas6634 (talk) 21:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texas6634 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unlocked. Like I mentioned in the above paragraph I'm willing to be a good contributer and I regret even vandalizing in the first place I would appreciate it if you can give me another chance

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to.
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

• Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I guess I can just forget about editing Wikipedia then. And yes I was wanting to prove to you that I can be a constructive editor especially after I showed remorse for vandalizing to begin with and you still wanted to judge me on being an bad Wikipedian judgemental people I don't like one bit but to be clear I would have liked to show you how good I can be on Wikipedia but those guidelines in the deline unblock I respectfully disagree with. However I spent quite a bit of time today reviewing the rules and policies of Wikipedia in which I would agree to follow. Having said that I would greatly appreciate it if you can give me another chance on Wikipedia. --Texas6634 (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

So I'm clear on what you've said, you don't want to follow detailed advice on how you might show us how you would like to contribute to this project, you'd like to be unblocked after doing nothing but vandalizing? Really all we ask is that you express interest in something specific and show how you will help the project by following its rules. It's really not much to ask. Acroterion (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

You're not clear on everything I said: I never said that I want to come back so I can "vandalize." What I said was I want to come back so I can show you that I can be a good wikipedian and good wikipedian's don't vandalize they make constructive edits and use reliable sources from links to where ever the reliable source of that particular information is coming from. So as I have said I want to prove to you that I can be a good editor but the detailed advice is not how I want to show you I can be a good editor and no I'm not saying I want to vandalize again as I have mentioned previously I have full regret on doing that.--Texas6634 (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Neither you nor I said anything about vandalizing in the future. What I am looking for is clear indication of what you want to do when unblocked, given that all of your contributions up to the moment you were blocked were vandalism. We simply ask that you show us how you might help the project by providing an example. Acroterion (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok then that's fine so unblock please so I can edit an article and show you how I can help this project--Texas6634 (talk) 17:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

• You are not in the position to chose. I give you 2nd chance: you can take or you can leave Wikipedia forever. I strongly recommend the first option, because I'm not asking from you anything special: just to show us how you intend to improve articles. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok I'll go with that 2nd chance option then.--Texas6634 (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

KEZW

When the station signed on in 1954, it aired a beautiful music format as KOSI-AM, and was paired with KOSI-FM. In 1981, it became KEZW, and adopted an adult standards format, which would last for the next three decades. On December 27, 2015, KEZW adopted the oldies format from sister station KRWZ, which has flipped to sports on April 8 2016 and is currently owned by Kroenke Sports and Entertainment.

References

http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/95557/kse-media-ventures-acquires-krwz-from-entercom/

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texas6634 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I decided to go along with that 2nd option you previously gave me and hopefully this will show you how a good editor and hopefully in the future a better editor I can be.

Decline reason:

"Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies." Your edit was trivial. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/95562/1430-kezw-denver-to-assume-cruisin-oldies-format/

Let me tell you something. Iam a person with whats called a Disability and as a result I was bullied for a lot of years. I may edit articles in a different way than anyone else would on Wikipedia but I dang sure would try by best to follow the rules. I have worked my A$$ off yesterday in making sure that my work on this talk page as per requested were up to your expectations as well as do an unblock request when my work was completed which I did. And here it is almost Noon eastern time and you tell me that my work wasn't great. I should have known that you like to discriminate people on Wikipedia who are either handicapped or have disabilities and you should be ashamed of your selves. Like I said I may not be as good on here as everyone else when it comes to editing Wikipedia but darn it I can sure try. You need to think more about who you're dealing with on Wikipedia. This is not meant to be a personal attack but it's something I needed to say. I really think I deserved that second chance. If I could I would've brought this up in ANI (Administrators noticeboard Incidents).--Texas6634 (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)