Talk:2016–17 UEFA Champions League: Difference between revisions
→Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2016: new section |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
UEFA today announced that Galatasaray "will be excluded from participating in the next UEFA club competition for which they would otherwise qualify in the next two (2) seasons (i.e. the 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons)." [http://www.uefa.org/protecting-the-game/club-licensing-and-financial-fair-play/news/newsid=2338564.html]. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">[[User:Qed237|<b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>]] [[User talk:Qed237|<b style="color:green">(talk)</b>]]</i> 13:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
UEFA today announced that Galatasaray "will be excluded from participating in the next UEFA club competition for which they would otherwise qualify in the next two (2) seasons (i.e. the 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons)." [http://www.uefa.org/protecting-the-game/club-licensing-and-financial-fair-play/news/newsid=2338564.html]. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">[[User:Qed237|<b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>]] [[User talk:Qed237|<b style="color:green">(talk)</b>]]</i> 13:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2016 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|2016–17 UEFA Champions League|answered=no}} |
|||
<!-- Be sure to state UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes; editors who can edit the protected page need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests WILL be declined. --> |
|||
<!-- Begin request --> |
|||
I would like you to update the fact that Benfica have qualified for the UEFA Champions League group stage while FC Porto have confirmed their place in the play-off round. |
|||
<!-- End request --> |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/46.11.65.142|46.11.65.142]] ([[User talk:46.11.65.142|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:38, 25 April 2016
 | Football Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Association ranking
Instead |-valign=top add |-valign=top style="font-size:90%" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.187.202.135 (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Liepaja
Earlier today I was approached by LICA98 regarding the situation for Liepaja. Last season they were not given a UEFA license, because they were "affiliated with the Latvian Football Federation for less than three years after reforming from the dissolved Liepājas Metalurgs", which happened in 2014 (and would mean they could not participate until 2017). However I can not find any information for this season and the newspaper saying they wont get license for the current season now say With the triumph of Latvian championship Liepaja next year acquired the right to participate in the UEFA Champions League qualifier. (google translate). Does anyone know what will happen? Qed237 (talk) 13:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Here are the club licensing regulations: [1]. Article 12(2): "The membership and the contractual relationship (if any) must have lasted – at the start of the licence season – for at least three consecutive years." However, Annex I, Article B(1): "The UEFA administration may, in accordance with Article 4, grant exceptions on the following matters: ... d) Non-applicability of the three-year rule defined in Article 12(2) in case of change of legal form or company structure of the licence applicant on a case-by-case basis;" So I suppose Liepaja will not pass the three-year rule, but UEFA can make exceptions if they apply. Chanheigeorge (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Also, does "three years" means "three whole years" or "third year"? The license will be granted in the middle of the 2016 Latvian Higher League, which would be Liepaja's third season (about 2.5 years after its reform). Now of course they qualified from the 2015 Latvian Higher League, which would be their second season. So this case seems a bit open to interpretation, and I do not know enough about any precedent to comment on it. Chanheigeorge (talk) 21:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Accesslist
In the original accesslist from UEFA there are 3 fairplay teams, but now UEFA has said there will be no fairplay teams without mentioning how the changes to accesslist will be. Now I saw a link, this pdf, on Kassiesa forum to a temporary accesslist without the fairplay teams and with needed adjustments (three cup winners moved to second round). Should/could we use this as source or do we have to wait for confirmation from UEFA? Qed237 (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- These internal circulars are issued from UEFA, so I think they can be used as sources (and has been used frequently in the past). Chanheigeorge (talk) 21:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Galatasaray excluded
UEFA today announced that Galatasaray "will be excluded from participating in the next UEFA club competition for which they would otherwise qualify in the next two (2) seasons (i.e. the 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons)." [2]. Qed237 (talk) 13:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2016
 | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at 2016–17 UEFA Champions League. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
I would like you to update the fact that Benfica have qualified for the UEFA Champions League group stage while FC Porto have confirmed their place in the play-off round. 46.11.65.142 (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)