Jump to content

User talk:UKER: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 3: Line 3:
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 3
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadsleft = 11111
|algo = old(15d)
|algo = old(15d)
|archive = User talk:UKER/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:UKER/Archive %(counter)d

Revision as of 20:37, 25 April 2016


Hello, UKER. You have new messages at Chaheel Riens's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Invitation

A gummi bear holding a sign that says "Thank you"
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, UKER,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MKX

Someone (not me!) has since reverted your edit in the MKX character section. I agree that the content is no longer required, but I figured it could be left there until the game's release in two weeks, after which the confirmation sources will also get tossed. Lemme know what you think. sixtynine • speak up • 16:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. The change you're talking about is probably this edit in which a paragraph was crudely restored by an anon. I'd go on and delete it again, but I understand if you think it's for the better to leave it alone until the proper release. Cheers! --uKER (talk) 16:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just re-removed the character content in the article. I additionally namedropped you in the edit summary so that people will leave it alone. :') sixtynine • speak up • 00:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spidervenom123 got permabanned yesterday after messing up more articles, so no more of his agonizing edits. sixtynine • speak up • 02:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I never ever noticed him. I just edited some poorly written stuff from him once. I saw his edits though and I must say banning him was probably for the better. Thanks for the notice! Cheers! --uKER (talk) 02:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

TY for the edit. Yeah, Goro did lose his arms in the comic, but that was ages ago. Aside from that, this user insists on posting rambling, poorly written summaries of what goes on in the comics. He once wrote 3k bytes of stuff in Raiden's article. sixtynine • speak up • 15:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, now that you mention it I seem to recall Goro's arms thing. IIRC, that was to justify him not having four arms in a portable console or something, right? --uKER (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]