Talk:Internet Browser (Nintendo 3DS): Difference between revisions
Supernerd11 (talk | contribs) →New 3DS: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The New 3DS has an improved web browser. I've used the browser on both the old and new ones, and sites like xkcd that don't completely work on the old one do now. Here's a source, but since it's only one and doesn't go into detail, I'm not sure it's worth actually putting in the article: [http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/21/7025667/new-nintendo-3ds-review Review from The Verge]. |
The New 3DS has an improved web browser. I've used the browser on both the old and new ones, and sites like xkcd that don't completely work on the old one do now. Here's a source, but since it's only one and doesn't go into detail, I'm not sure it's worth actually putting in the article: [http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/21/7025667/new-nintendo-3ds-review Review from The Verge]. |
||
== Homebrew == |
|||
should the fact using the browser to run the homebrew Launcher be noted here? |
Revision as of 18:42, 29 April 2016
Acid Tests
Someone should probably add Acid Test results as well as more flaws of the browser. www.acidtests.org --NeatNit (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Needs cleanup
The grammar and syntax in this article is a mess. I've cleanup up some, but it needs considerable work to remove passive voice, run-on sentences, comma-splicing, etc.
When I get a chance, I will add some detailed tests for browser support so that we don't have statements (many removed, now) that say "partial" or "great" for standards support without any facts to back up those adjectives.
I would like to add some information about the MPO image support, but to do so, I would be plugging my own website, and I do not see Wikipedia as a place to do that. Danielgump (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
New 3DS
The New 3DS has an improved web browser. I've used the browser on both the old and new ones, and sites like xkcd that don't completely work on the old one do now. Here's a source, but since it's only one and doesn't go into detail, I'm not sure it's worth actually putting in the article: Review from The Verge.
Homebrew
should the fact using the browser to run the homebrew Launcher be noted here?