Jump to content

Talk:Viridiana: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.227.250.214 - ""
Migueldvb (talk | contribs)
Reception: new section
Line 25: Line 25:


[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

== Reception ==

Is the 1962 New York Times review representative of the reception of this film from comtemporary American critics? and does the opinion of this steemed group have an important bearing on the scope of this article? [[User:Migueldvb|Miguel de Val-Borro]] ([[User talk:Migueldvb|talk]]) 14:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:22, 2 May 2016

WikiProject iconMexico Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFilm: Mexican / Spanish / Core Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Mexican cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Spanish cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is on the project's core list.

Untitled

The synopsis proudly proclaims that it misses crucial information. Why? Could someone who has seen the film clean it up? Cop 633 20:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buñuel's age

The article for Luis Buñuel says he was born in 1900, but this article says that in 1977 he was sixty-one. Which is correct?

TJSwoboda 22:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Viridiana cover.jpg

Image:Viridiana cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Mexico?

Why is this film relevant to WikiProject Mexico? Sure Buñuel directed some Mexican movies, but as the article says Viridiana was a Spanish movie. Pearce.duncan (talk) 02:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps because it was co-produced by Gustavo Alatriste. Or maybe because Silvia Pinal is a Mexican actress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.250.214 (talk) 03:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


BetacommandBot 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Is the 1962 New York Times review representative of the reception of this film from comtemporary American critics? and does the opinion of this steemed group have an important bearing on the scope of this article? Miguel de Val-Borro (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]