User talk:Epikman: Difference between revisions
m Added birthdate |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Welcome == |
== Welcome == |
||
My birthday is Aug. 16 so if anyone wants to know, there it is. {{smiley}} |
|||
Thank you for being considerate, polite and helpful towards Wikipedia! {{smiley}} |
|||
{| width="100%" style="background:transparent" |
{| width="100%" style="background:transparent" |
Revision as of 21:40, 9 May 2016
Welcome
My birthday is Aug. 16 so if anyone wants to know, there it is.
Thank you for being considerate, polite and helpful towards Wikipedia!
|
Thank you, NottNott (talk · contribs)! :)
Man epik (Epikman) (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Epikman: Purposes and Intentions
I intend to work on some of the newer articles to ensure that their sources are good and that the articles do reflect their sources. I have seen a lot of newer articles do this recently and I know how much of an impact Administrative tools could have on Wiki---therefore I must solemnly promise to do only that which I am 100% sure is for the bettering and not for the worsening of Wikipedia.
Important Events (or in other words, errors/corrections I could not make and would like to raise attention to)
No important events/errors recently; I am actively contributing however and would like to continue to usefully do so!
On RFA
(talk page stalker) Hey there! Welcome to Wikipedia. Recently I was scrolling through recent changes and I noticed your intention in becoming an administrator. You may wish to read the guidelines WP:NOTNOW - being an administrator usually requires several years of experience with thousands of edits to various different areas on the wiki.
There are plenty of ways you can contribute the site without requiring administrative tools - just get started! Adminship is not particularly glamorous work, nor is it a WP:TROPHY. I hope this has helped you, and if you have any questions feel free to let me know on my talk page. NottNott|talk 20:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
A sad and depressing sight
I recently clicked "Random article" to come to the article entitled Luc's Lantern.
Before, I had gotten help with a German article under this same heading title, so don't be fooled
Anyways, I think this article would do good with some watching on the parts of responsible editors---something seems incomplete or not right about it; and my senses say that as an editor I should have this checked out.
Thanks,
Man epik (Epikman) (talk) 21:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)