User talk:Bishonen: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→DS block for User:Giridharmurthy100: humanspeak! |
→'Zilla Beanie: new section |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:Thanks, [[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]. If I'd been around at the right moment I think I might possibly have warned the user after the first post-ban edit — not the actually first, which was so harmless, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kapu_%28caste%29&diff=prev&oldid=723849464 this one] — because they're so new, so genuinely green — not a sock, then, I think — and the topic ban template I gave them is in miserably bureaucratic language which more competent editors may well have trouble with. The templates are the worst part of arbitration enforcement. But I've spent the afternoon in the emergency room with an aged relative. (Comes to us all.) And really, blocking them is all good; they have no other interests than Kapu (caste), so my topic ban ''was'' practically a block, and we have to consider Sitush's sanity, too. 72 hours seems right, and very clever of you to use the uw-aeblock template. But haha, no, you're not done, are you kidding? [''Bishonen slaps her knees and staggers around a bit. These virgins!''] You're also supposed to log the block [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016| here]]. Look for my topic ban of Giridharmurthy100 and note your block right underneath. It's actually comparatively easy, the page doesn't have the thrice cursed ''tables'' that community sanctions do, that are the bane of my life; you just write it in humanspeak. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC). |
:Thanks, [[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]. If I'd been around at the right moment I think I might possibly have warned the user after the first post-ban edit — not the actually first, which was so harmless, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kapu_%28caste%29&diff=prev&oldid=723849464 this one] — because they're so new, so genuinely green — not a sock, then, I think — and the topic ban template I gave them is in miserably bureaucratic language which more competent editors may well have trouble with. The templates are the worst part of arbitration enforcement. But I've spent the afternoon in the emergency room with an aged relative. (Comes to us all.) And really, blocking them is all good; they have no other interests than Kapu (caste), so my topic ban ''was'' practically a block, and we have to consider Sitush's sanity, too. 72 hours seems right, and very clever of you to use the uw-aeblock template. But haha, no, you're not done, are you kidding? [''Bishonen slaps her knees and staggers around a bit. These virgins!''] You're also supposed to log the block [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016| here]]. Look for my topic ban of Giridharmurthy100 and note your block right underneath. It's actually comparatively easy, the page doesn't have the thrice cursed ''tables'' that community sanctions do, that are the bane of my life; you just write it in humanspeak. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC). |
||
::You are the only person I know who says AE/DS etc is "humanspeak". —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 07:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
::You are the only person I know who says AE/DS etc is "humanspeak". —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 07:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
== 'Zilla Beanie == |
|||
Do you care to argue whether or not [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_June_1#File:ZillaBeanie.jpg this] image will be saved? It was just a lark I created many moons ago. I don't have the energy to argue unless you would like to keep it. [[User:Tex|Tex]] ([[User talk:Tex|talk]]) 14:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:18, 6 June 2016
 | This user has been blocked from editing Wikipedia 3 times. And the last admin blocked by Jimbo. The LAST. Don't trifle with her. |
DS block for User:Giridharmurthy100
Hi - blocked this guy for 72 hours for violating the DS you placed on him - he was reported to AIV and I guess it was my turn. Did I do it right? Do I need to log it somewhere? I'm an AE virgin, so don't abuse me too much. ;-) Katietalk 19:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Katie. If I'd been around at the right moment I think I might possibly have warned the user after the first post-ban edit — not the actually first, which was so harmless, but this one — because they're so new, so genuinely green — not a sock, then, I think — and the topic ban template I gave them is in miserably bureaucratic language which more competent editors may well have trouble with. The templates are the worst part of arbitration enforcement. But I've spent the afternoon in the emergency room with an aged relative. (Comes to us all.) And really, blocking them is all good; they have no other interests than Kapu (caste), so my topic ban was practically a block, and we have to consider Sitush's sanity, too. 72 hours seems right, and very clever of you to use the uw-aeblock template. But haha, no, you're not done, are you kidding? [Bishonen slaps her knees and staggers around a bit. These virgins!] You're also supposed to log the block here. Look for my topic ban of Giridharmurthy100 and note your block right underneath. It's actually comparatively easy, the page doesn't have the thrice cursed tables that community sanctions do, that are the bane of my life; you just write it in humanspeak. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC).
- You are the only person I know who says AE/DS etc is "humanspeak". —SpacemanSpiff 07:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
'Zilla Beanie
Do you care to argue whether or not this image will be saved? It was just a lark I created many moons ago. I don't have the energy to argue unless you would like to keep it. Tex (talk) 14:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
