Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan (singer): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:28, 17 July 2016

CK Morgan (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:MUSICBIO. The sources are passing mentions or release announcements. The chart, 1wxrld, is not a national chart it is essentially a blog. ("Recently I started a music chart, a very very personal listing of songs I called 1wxrld charts of a Top 200 weekly listing of songs updated every Sunday. Of course this has no bearing on actual success, as it is a very personal, say biased chart of mine"^{From About 1wxrld}).

This article was deleted at AfD last year and should properly be looked at a CSD#G4 however the creator has removed the tag two or three times [1] [2] [3] and I am not going to war over it. Jbh ^Talk 14:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Links to previous AfDs:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 14:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 14:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note Pinging @Joe Decker: the closing admin of the last AfD who can check if this article and the older one are substantially different. Jbh ^Talk 15:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In my view, there are sufficient differences to keep this from being eligible for speedy deletion under G4. (Not expressing a view on redeletion here, just that there are differences in sourcing and text relative to the version in the discussion I closed. --joe decker ^talk 06:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Exactly like Joe said this version is better then the previous one that was deleted This article should not be deleted it could be maybe be improved better that's why there's a stub over there for it to be more improved This article is way better then the old one so next time Do a lil bit of homework before speedy deletion Debbyloves234 (talk) 07:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Note''' Pinging {{ping|Joe Decker}} the closing admin of the last AfD who can check if this article and the older one are substantially different. [[User:Jbhunley|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:14pt;color:#886600">J</span><span style="font-family:Lucida Calligraphy;font-size:10pt;color:#886600">bh</span>]][[User_talk:Jbhunley|<span style="color: #00888F"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 15:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 *: In my view, there are sufficient differences to keep this from being eligible for speedy deletion under G4. (Not expressing a view on redeletion here, just that there are differences in sourcing and text relative to the version in the discussion I closed. --[[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]] 06:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Comment'''
+Exactly like Joe said this version is better then the previous one that was deleted
+This article should not be deleted it could be maybe be improved better that's why there's a stub over there for it to be more improved
+This article is way better then the old one so next time
+Do a lil bit of homework before speedy deletion [[User:Debbyloves234|Debbyloves234]] ([[User talk:Debbyloves234|talk]]) 07:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)