Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Bangladesh Province: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Comment''' - While I have not yet evaluated the notability of the organization, I'm not sure if the article is indeed promotional. [[User:GeneralizationsAreBad|GAB]]<sup>[[User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad|gab]]</sup> 13:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - While I have not yet evaluated the notability of the organization, I'm not sure if the article is indeed promotional. [[User:GeneralizationsAreBad|GAB]]<sup>[[User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad|gab]]</sup> 13:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''strong keep''' - Group clearly meets the general notability guidelines, has carried out many attacks. this editor is an iranian shiite with a conflict of interest who goes around proposing deletion of all IS pages claiming they are not notable, despite them obviously being notable, he is a malicious vandal[[User:Smith1122|Smith1122]] ([[User talk:Smith1122|talk]]) 10:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:44, 29 July 2016
- Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Bangladesh Province (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and does not pass WP:GNG! The article seems to be promotional. Mhhossein (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - While I have not yet evaluated the notability of the organization, I'm not sure if the article is indeed promotional. GABgab 13:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- strong keep - Group clearly meets the general notability guidelines, has carried out many attacks. this editor is an iranian shiite with a conflict of interest who goes around proposing deletion of all IS pages claiming they are not notable, despite them obviously being notable, he is a malicious vandalSmith1122 (talk) 10:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)