Revision as of 17:53, 2 September 2006

Thank you for your probably accurate contribution. I didn't agree however, so reverted or removed it.

--Knucklehead2 14:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stark Hyperspace War on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sopranosmob781 15:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to nonsensical content on Wikipedia, as you did to Stark Hyperspace War. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sopranosmob781 15:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 5 2006 (UTC) to Stark Hyperspace War

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this IP address is shared by multiple users and you have not made any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning. Molerat 15:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:218.43.35.97, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia, unless the target is one that has been declared open game, e.g. Mel Gibson. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sopranosmob781 15:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedia

I have reverted your edits to the above article, as they were in clear violation of WP:NPOV. If you have an issue with the content of this article, please raise a discussion on the associated talk page. If you have an issue with Uncyclopedia's content, the proper place to raise it is on Uncyclopedia, not here. Thanks. -- Codeine 17:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto again the above statement. I have also informed Wikipedia's administrators of your persistent attempts to insert subjective material into this article, in violation of WP:NPOV. -- Codeine 13:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Uncyclopedia is not associated with Wikimedia, and continuing to insert this false information is considered vandalism. Also, please heed Codeine's warnings about NPOV; opinions do not belong in Wikipedia articles. Thanks, Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Uncyclopedia

Your recent edit to Uncyclopedia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 14:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh?

Hello 'Rangeley'. I can't see why you felt the need to remove a recent and accurate contribution not just from the page concerned but from the history lists as well. Was that really called for? Also, you seem semi-literate at best. Regards.

Vandal [sic. This and the below originally adressed to 'Rangeley'.]!

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Re. uncyclopedia entry: 'Rangeley' removed valid history pages to suppress information and left the page after editing without finishing sentences. Who the hell does s/he work for?"

Where? ~Rangeley (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you? ~Rangeley (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Uncyclopedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ST47 16:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a user's page, as you did with User:Rangeley, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ST47 16:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uhuh. What in specific have I done that you consider a "supression of facts"? ~Rangeley (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango 123 17:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unwanted edits to other users' user pages without their permission. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thanks. RexNL 17:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well you seem to feel free to add unwanted edits to this page

RexNL is such a pathetic no-lifer and arsehole editor that he has to protect his own page.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Please stop adding unwanted edits to other users' user pages without their permission. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Upv2 -->  [[User:RexNL|RexNL]] 17:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
+=Well you seem to feel free to add unwanted edits to this page=
+RexNL is such a pathetic no-lifer and arsehole editor that he has to protect his own page.