Talk:Lifting scheme: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:30, 27 September 2016

Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

"Although every reconstructable filter bank can be expressed in terms of lifting steps, an explicit decomposition for a family of wavelets is only known for the Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau wavelet, so far."

What ? What about biorthogonal splines, biorthogonal sinc, and integer biorthogonal sinc wavelets ? (The latter two are my constructions, but they definitely was constructed via lifting) Frigo 12:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant is, that lifting steps are usually derived from existing wavelet filters using the decomposition by the Euclidean algorithm as proposed by Daubechies and Sweldens. I have not seen so far, that people develop wavelet filters or families of wavelet filters from lifting composition or who give a generic lifting decomposition for their families of wavelets. If you know such generic decompositions, then please extend the list and provide references. You may visit the article on Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau_wavelet#Lifting_decomposition in order to see what I mean. HenningThielemann (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I'm proposing that Generalized Lifting be merged into this page, assuming that its content is notable enough for inclusion. Alternatively, it may be that Generalized lifting should just be deleted. Agathman (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that, after the improvement, it has enought entity to remain as a separate article from the Lifting Scheme. Xavirema (talk) 12:46, 17 October 2009 (France).

Typos

In the CDF 9/7 filter section, "evne" and "Updata" appear to be typos. Is this the case? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

This text contains plagiarism, text is taken from Mallat, 2009: A wavelet tour of signal processing: The sparse way, p. 350

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Maths rating |class=Start |priority=Low |field=analysis}}
 "Although every reconstructable filter bank can be expressed in terms of lifting steps, an explicit decomposition for a family of wavelets is only known for the Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau wavelet, so far."
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 In the [[lifting scheme#CDF 9/7 filter|CDF 9/7 filter]] section, "evne" and "Updata" appear to be typos. Is this the case? --[[User:SoledadKabocha|SoledadKabocha]] ([[User talk:SoledadKabocha|talk]]) 02:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
+== Plagiarism ==
+This text contains plagiarism, text is taken from Mallat, 2009: A wavelet tour of signal processing: The sparse way, p. 350