Jump to content

BOMARC missile accident site: Difference between revisions

Add links
Coordinates: 40°2′4.43″N 74°26′34.56″W / 40.0345639°N 74.4429333°W / 40.0345639; -74.4429333
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
<ref></ref>
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.5)
Line 11: Line 11:
In a 1992 report, the Air Force wrote that the missile launcher from Shelter 204 had been removed from the shelter shortly after the accident, and that no records about the manner of disposal of the missile launcher existed. They found five anomalous areas which could represent the buried launcher.<ref name=sp/>
In a 1992 report, the Air Force wrote that the missile launcher from Shelter 204 had been removed from the shelter shortly after the accident, and that no records about the manner of disposal of the missile launcher existed. They found five anomalous areas which could represent the buried launcher.<ref name=sp/>
From 1999-2000 the USGS sampled and tested the [[Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer]] with shallow ground water and sediment for radionuclides. No manmade radionuclide was present in the well-bottom sediments, or unfiltered or filtered water samples.<ref name=usgs>{{cite web|authors=Zoltan Szabo, Otto S. Zapecza, Jeannette H. Oden, and Donald E. Rice|title=Radiochemical Sampling and Analysis of Shallow Ground Water and Sediment at the BOMARC Missile Facility, East-Central New Jersey, 1999-2000, Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5062|url=http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20055062|publisher=US geological survey|accessdate=31 July 2015|date=2005}}</ref>
From 1999-2000 the USGS sampled and tested the [[Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer]] with shallow ground water and sediment for radionuclides. No manmade radionuclide was present in the well-bottom sediments, or unfiltered or filtered water samples.<ref name=usgs>{{cite web|authors=Zoltan Szabo, Otto S. Zapecza, Jeannette H. Oden, and Donald E. Rice|title=Radiochemical Sampling and Analysis of Shallow Ground Water and Sediment at the BOMARC Missile Facility, East-Central New Jersey, 1999-2000, Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5062|url=http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20055062|publisher=US geological survey|accessdate=31 July 2015|date=2005}}</ref>
From April 2002 through May 27, 2004,<ref name=Morgan>{{cite news|url=http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=12080114&BRD=1091&PAG=461&dept_id=425707&rfi=6|title=BOMARC accident site cleaned|author=Scott Morgan|work=Bordentown Register-News (NJ)
From April 2002 through May 27, 2004,<ref name=Morgan>{{cite news
|url=http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=12080114&BRD=1091&PAG=461&dept_id=425707&rfi=6
|title=BOMARC accident site cleaned
|author=Scott Morgan
|work=Bordentown Register-News (NJ)
|date=June 24, 2004
⚫
|date=June 24, 2004|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://tri.gmnews.com/news/2002-05-16/Front_Page/005.html|title=BOMARC cleanup to begin Radioactive waste at Plumsted site will be taken to Utah - tri.gmnews.com - Tri-Town News|publisher=|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref> {{Convert|21998|yd3|abbr=on}} of "contaminated debris and soils were packaged, shipped, and disposed<!-- at Envirocare of Utah-->"<ref>Duratek 2006, cited by Rademacher</ref> at [[Clive, Utah]];<ref>http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1163.pdf</ref> the remains of the shelter were removed.<!-- visible on Google Earth; exact date not clear, between 2002-12-31 and 2006-07-16 --> In 2005, the contaminated area was estimated as 7 acres<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Actinide Nanoparticle Research |editor1=Kalmykov, Stepan N. |editor2=Denecke, Melissa A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nY3jWX5GjIUC&pg=PA348&lpg=PA348&dq=mcguire+bomarc+accident&source=bl&ots=y6ykqO4n2Q&sig=caPIGn3c8a0WNUDmdvDktPtWQl0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TGcCUvOAMYnEyQH7v4CYDg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBDge#v=onepage&q=mcguire%20bomarc%20accident&f=false}}</ref> and ~{{Convert|60|yd3|abbr=on}} were additionally remediated by 2007.<ref>http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2009/pdfs/9479.pdf</ref> The 1972<ref>http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1405.pdf</ref> RW-01 perimeter fence with height {{Convert|6|ft|abbr=on}} topped with barbed wire<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.strangeusa.com/Viewlocation.aspx?id=11933#sthash.H8ylT71X.dpbs|title=BOMARC Rt 539 New Egypt, NJ 08533 Ocean Abandoned|author=Matt Montana|publisher=|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref> was extended by 2007 to include a larger area on the south.{{r|Groves}} A 2013 study compared the characteristics of the accident's particle release with the nuclear warhead dispersals of the [[1966 Palomares B-52 crash]] and [[1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/86999655/morphology-actinide-rich-particles-released-from-bomarc-accident-collected-from-soil-post-remediation|title=Morphology of actinide-rich particles released from the BOMARC accident and collected from soil post remediation|authors=James Bowen Samuel Glover, Henry Spitz|publisher= EBSCO Publishing |journal= Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry|date=May 2013|volume=296|issue= 2|page=853|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref>
|accessdate=20 December 2014
⚫
}}{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://tri.gmnews.com/news/2002-05-16/Front_Page/005.html |title=BOMARC cleanup to begin Radioactive waste at Plumsted site will be taken to Utah - tri.gmnews.com - Tri-Town News |publisher= |accessdate=20 December 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141221000918/http://tri.gmnews.com/news/2002-05-16/Front_Page/005.html |archivedate=21 December 2014 |df= }}</ref> {{Convert|21998|yd3|abbr=on}} of "contaminated debris and soils were packaged, shipped, and disposed<!-- at Envirocare of Utah-->"<ref>Duratek 2006, cited by Rademacher</ref> at [[Clive, Utah]];<ref>http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1163.pdf</ref> the remains of the shelter were removed.<!-- visible on Google Earth; exact date not clear, between 2002-12-31 and 2006-07-16 --> In 2005, the contaminated area was estimated as 7 acres<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Actinide Nanoparticle Research |editor1=Kalmykov, Stepan N. |editor2=Denecke, Melissa A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nY3jWX5GjIUC&pg=PA348&lpg=PA348&dq=mcguire+bomarc+accident&source=bl&ots=y6ykqO4n2Q&sig=caPIGn3c8a0WNUDmdvDktPtWQl0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TGcCUvOAMYnEyQH7v4CYDg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBDge#v=onepage&q=mcguire%20bomarc%20accident&f=false}}</ref> and ~{{Convert|60|yd3|abbr=on}} were additionally remediated by 2007.<ref>http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2009/pdfs/9479.pdf</ref> The 1972<ref>http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1405.pdf</ref> RW-01 perimeter fence with height {{Convert|6|ft|abbr=on}} topped with barbed wire<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.strangeusa.com/Viewlocation.aspx?id=11933#sthash.H8ylT71X.dpbs|title=BOMARC Rt 539 New Egypt, NJ 08533 Ocean Abandoned|author=Matt Montana|publisher=|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref> was extended by 2007 to include a larger area on the south.{{r|Groves}} A 2013 study compared the characteristics of the accident's particle release with the nuclear warhead dispersals of the [[1966 Palomares B-52 crash]] and [[1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/86999655/morphology-actinide-rich-particles-released-from-bomarc-accident-collected-from-soil-post-remediation|title=Morphology of actinide-rich particles released from the BOMARC accident and collected from soil post remediation|authors=James Bowen Samuel Glover, Henry Spitz|publisher= EBSCO Publishing |journal= Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry|date=May 2013|volume=296|issue= 2|page=853|accessdate=20 December 2014}}</ref>


==BOMARC Base No. 1==
==BOMARC Base No. 1==

Revision as of 11:59, 23 October 2016

"1960 Fort Dix IM-99 accident" redirects here. For the main air force base 6 mi (9.7 km) southwest[1] of this BOMARC launch complex, see McGuire Air Force Base.

40°2′4.43″N 74°26′34.56″W / 40.0345639°N 74.4429333°W / 40.0345639; -74.4429333

The BOMARC launch complex at Fort Dix

The BOMARC Missile Accident Site[2][3] ("BOMARC Site RW-01") is a 75-acre (30 ha)[4] fenced-off[1] radiological waste site of the United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program contaminated primarily with "weapons-grade plutonium (WGP), highly-enriched and depleted uranium."[5] The Cold War nuclear accident occurred at Launcher Shelter 204, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (commonly known as the McGuire Unit at Fort Dix), Burlington County, New Jersey, United States, approximately 16.1 miles (25.9 km) south-southeast of Trenton. Launcher Shelter 204 stored the CIM-10 Bomarc missile (one of fifty-four at the base).[6]

1960 Fort Dix IM-99 accident

"On 7 June 1960, an explosion in a helium tank [between the missile's fuel tanks[7] took place in Shelter 204 causing a fire in a liquid-fueled, nuclear-tipped BOMARC missile. The fire burned uninhibited for about 30 minutes. Firefighting activities, using water as a suppressant, were conducted for 15 hours. As a result, materials from the shelter flowed under the front shelter doors, down the asphalt apron and street between the row of shelters, and into the drainage ditch".[5] "Contamination was restricted to an area immediately beneath the weapon and an adjacent elongated area approximately 100 feet long".[8][9] A nuclear response team from Griffiss Air Force Base found "no trace of dispersed radiation" during spot checks "outside the facility's boundaries" for 66 mi (106 km).[1] Approximately 300 g (11 oz) of WGP was not recovered,[10] "A significant fraction of the radiological material contained in the weapon [was] shipped…to Medina Base, San Antonio TX"[5] and then to Amarillo.[11]

According to the Trenton Times, “In June 1987, traces of a radioactive substance used in nuclear warheads (americium-241 related to plutonium) were found about one-half mile from the site."[12] In a 1992 report, the Air Force wrote that the missile launcher from Shelter 204 had been removed from the shelter shortly after the accident, and that no records about the manner of disposal of the missile launcher existed. They found five anomalous areas which could represent the buried launcher.[12] From 1999-2000 the USGS sampled and tested the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer with shallow ground water and sediment for radionuclides. No manmade radionuclide was present in the well-bottom sediments, or unfiltered or filtered water samples.[13] From April 2002 through May 27, 2004,[4][14] 21,998 cu yd (16,819 m3) of "contaminated debris and soils were packaged, shipped, and disposed"[15] at Clive, Utah;[16] the remains of the shelter were removed. In 2005, the contaminated area was estimated as 7 acres[17] and ~60 cu yd (46 m3) were additionally remediated by 2007.[18] The 1972[19] RW-01 perimeter fence with height 6 ft (1.8 m) topped with barbed wire[20] was extended by 2007 to include a larger area on the south.[10] A 2013 study compared the characteristics of the accident's particle release with the nuclear warhead dispersals of the 1966 Palomares B-52 crash and 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash.[21]

BOMARC Base No. 1

For the UHF radio station 1 mi (1.6 km) northeast of the Launch Area and used for BOMARC command guidance, see Ground-to-Air Transmitter Facility.

BOMARC Base No. 1 was the New Jersey missile launch complex of 218 acres (88 ha)[22] within the "Range and Impact Area"[23] at the Northeast corner of Fort Dix.[24] The military installation was 1 of 2 Cold War BOMARC bases of the New York Air Defense Sector (cf. Long Island's Suffolk County Missile Annex). The Formerly Used Defense Site was the 1st operational BOMARC base and had both a "Missile Support Area" with a Squadron Operations Center and a "Launch Area" with 56 Mode II Launcher Shelters in 2 flights (e.g., 2 compressor buildings were available to simultaneously get 2 missiles to the "Standby" stage prior to "Fire-up".) [24] The missile complex was an annex of McGuire Air Force Base 6 mi (9.7 km) to the west where the sector's SAGE Direction Center (DC-01) was the missile launch control center. By 1955 the base was planned for January 1960 operations as the 1st BOMARC site[25] (construction began January 1958),[26] and it became operational on 1 September 1959 with 3 IM-99A missiles (24 by 1 January).[27] In December 1959, Col. Robert E. Stuart was the base commander, the 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron (BOMARC) commander was Lt. Col. Ernest B. Sheppard, and the Boeing support office was in New Egypt.[24]

External images
image icon 1960 damage to Launcher Shelter 204
image icon 21st century photos of shelter damage
image icon various facility photos

References

  1. ^ a b c "Air Force Magazine". Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  2. ^ "Provide Technical Services for BOMARC Missile Accident Site" (federal solicitation). FedBizOpps.gov. August 28, 2003 [August 20, 2003]. Retrieved 2013-08-07.
  3. ^ Vest, Gary (Nov 20, 1992). Record of Decision, BOMARC Missile Accident Site (PDF) (Report). Vol. AD-A261 304. Retrieved 2013-08-07.
  4. ^ a b Scott Morgan (June 24, 2004). "BOMARC accident site cleaned". Bordentown Register-News (NJ). Retrieved 20 December 2014.[permanent dead link]
  5. ^ a b c Rademacher; et al. (August 28, 2007). …Missile Shelters and Bunkers Scoping Survey Workplan (Report). Vol. ADA471460. Air Force Institute of Operational Health. Retrieved 2013-08-06. Explosives Ordnance Disposal (EOD) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) removed weapon debris that contained a significant fraction of the radiological material contained in the weapon, and shipped the materials to Medina Base, San Antonio TX. … Shelters 202, 205, and 209 were possibly contaminated as a result of the fire, firefighting, and subsequent decontamination of exterior locations. Also, shelter 210 was suspect, as it was used as a staging area for radiological sampling activities for many years.
  6. ^ "Cause of Bomarc Accident Not Announced by Air Force" (Google news archive). Eugene Register-Guard. June 8, 1960. Retrieved 2013-08-07. State police at the Ft. Dix barracks said they received a call from the base security police saying an atomic warhead had exploded and asking troopers to close off roads into the area.
  7. ^ Imholtz Jr, August (2011-04-26). "The Bomarc Missile Plutonium Spill Crisis: Exercises in Propaganda and Containment in 1960 and Beyond" (blog post). The Readex Blog. Retrieved 2013-08-07. …the container of nonflammable helium gas, located between two fuel tanks, burst… (quotation from webpage's image of a 1960 Augusta Chronicle article). "the fire was one of the largest environmental disasters in the environmentally sensitive Pinelands, which did not become federally protected until 1978" (quotation from the webpage's transcription of a 2010 Burlington County Times' article).
  8. ^ quotation from dod.mil
  9. ^ 1981 DoD statemtent
  10. ^ a b http://www.hps1.org/aahp/public/AAHP_Special_Sessions/2008_Pittsburgh/Nuclear%20Weapons%20Accidents%20-%20Leasons%20Learned.pdf
  11. ^ McCulla; et al. (May 22, 1996). BOMARC…Missile Accident Site Mitigation Review (PDF) (Report). Vol. LA-UR-96-1765. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Retrieved 2013-07-08.
  12. ^ a b THOMAS P. FARNER (July 23, 2015). "Nuclear 'Cleanup' Leaves Many Questions". The Sandpaper Inc. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
  13. ^ "Radiochemical Sampling and Analysis of Shallow Ground Water and Sediment at the BOMARC Missile Facility, East-Central New Jersey, 1999-2000, Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5062". US geological survey. 2005. Retrieved 31 July 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  14. ^ "BOMARC cleanup to begin Radioactive waste at Plumsted site will be taken to Utah - tri.gmnews.com - Tri-Town News". Archived from the original on 21 December 2014. Retrieved 20 December 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  15. ^ Duratek 2006, cited by Rademacher
  16. ^ http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1163.pdf
  17. ^ Kalmykov, Stepan N.; Denecke, Melissa A. (eds.). "Actinide Nanoparticle Research". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  18. ^ http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2009/pdfs/9479.pdf
  19. ^ http://amcadminrec.com/pdfs/mcguire2/AR-1405.pdf
  20. ^ Matt Montana. "BOMARC Rt 539 New Egypt, NJ 08533 Ocean Abandoned". Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  21. ^ "Morphology of actinide-rich particles released from the BOMARC accident and collected from soil post remediation". Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry. 296 (2). EBSCO Publishing: 853. May 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2014. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  22. ^ New York Times: "News accounts of the accident, which occurred on June 7, 1960, reported that a Bomarc missile burned on its pad at the 218-acre 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron base in Jackson Township, sending an orange-yellow cloud into the air and spreading a small amount of radioactive material around the 40-by-50-foot silo. [sic]"
  23. ^ "Public Health Assessment". Retrieved 2013-08-07.
  24. ^ a b c IM-99A Bases Manual (Report). Seattle, Washington: Boeing: Pilotless Aircraft Division. December 3, 1959. Differences in the Langley Base layout are due to planning for accommodation of the advanced missile system [(IM-99B) ground equipment with equipment for] the IM-99A system {{cite report}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  25. ^ McMullen, R. F. (15 February 1980). History of Air Defense Weapons 1946–1962 (Report). Vol. ADC Historical Study No. 14. Historical Division, Office of information, HQ ADC. p. 176. …in 1955, to support a program which called for 40 squadrons of BOMARC (120 missiles to a squadron for a total of 4,800 missiles), ADC reached a decision on the location of these 40 squadrons and suggested operational dates for each. The plan was as follows: … l. McGuire 1/60 2. Suffolk 2/60 3. Otis 3/60 4. Dow 4/60 5. Niagara Falls 1/61…6 . Plattsburg 1/61 7. Kinross 2/61 8. K. 1. Sawyer 2/61 9. Langley 2/61 10. Truax 3/61 11. Paine 3/61 12. Portland 3/61 … At the end of 1958, ADC plans called for construction of the following BOMARC bases in the following order: l. McGuire 2. Suffolk 3. Otis 4. Dow 5. Langley 6. Truax 7. Kinross 8. Duluth 9. Ethan Allen 10. Niagara Falls 11. Paine 12. Adair 13. Travis 14. Vandenberg 15. San Diego 16. - Malmstrom 17. Grand Forks 18. Minot 19. Youngstown 20. Seymour-Johnson 21. Bunker Hill 22. Sioux Falls 23. Charleston 24. McConnell 25. Holloman 26. McCoy 27. Amarillo 28. Barksdale 29 . Williams {{cite report}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  26. ^ "Abandoned & Little-Known Airfields: Eastern New Jersey". Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  27. ^ Preface by Buss, L. H. (Director) (1 May 1960). North American Air Defense Command and Continental Air Defense Command Historical Summary: July–December 1959 (PDF) (Report). Directorate of Command History: Office of Information Services. In the last six months of 1959, two IM-99A squadrons became operational and assumed an air defense role. The first…was the 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron (BOMARC) based at McGuire AFB, New Jersey…activated on 1 January 1959…operational on 1 September 1959 with three missiles.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BOMARC_missile_accident_site&oldid=745805242"