Talk:Clay, West Virginia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:23, 16 November 2016

United States: West Virginia Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Ape in heels

I see now that one person has previously removed content[1] related to what I have just added. I found a few international sources and cited them. If this is making national and international news, I see no reason to exclude a summary of the information. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 16:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Millions of stories make national and international news that are not encylopedic. This is more of a "five minutes of fame" story. Or infamy, in this case. It's a blip on the radar screen that will almost surely have no lasting notability. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672 (talk) 04:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wp:n relates to articles themselves, not content within articles. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 11:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about notability of the content e.g. noteworthiness (WP:NOTEWORTHY), which applies to all content within an article. This incident, while interesting and newsworthy, is not encylopedic. It's fine for a newspaper or tabloid, but not an encylopedia. Read #2 "News Reports" at WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, and WP:DUE and content policies. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672 (talk) 17:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Millions of stories make national and international news that are not encylopedic. This is more of a "five minutes of fame" story. Or infamy, in this case. It's a blip on the radar screen that will almost surely have no lasting notability. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|talk]]) 04:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 ::[[wp:n]] relates to articles themselves, not content within articles. [[User:Biosthmors|Biosthmors]] ([[User talk:Biosthmors|talk]]) <small>pls [[Wikipedia:Notifications#Features|notify]] me (i.e. &#123;&#123;[[Template:U|U]]&#125;&#125;) while signing a reply, thx</small> 11:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
-:::I am talking about notability of the content e.g. noteworthiness ([[WP:NOTEWORTHY]]), which applies to all content within an article. This incident, while interesting and newsworthy, is not encylopedic. It's fine for a newspaper or tabloid, but not an encylopedia. See WP:DUE and content policies. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|talk]]) 17:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
+:::I am talking about notability of the content e.g. noteworthiness ([[WP:NOTEWORTHY]]), which applies to all content within an article. This incident, while interesting and newsworthy, is not encylopedic. It's fine for a newspaper or tabloid, but not an encylopedia. Read #2 "News Reports" at [[WP:NOTNEWSPAPER]], and WP:DUE and content policies. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:29F7:758D:E55E:5672|talk]]) 17:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)