Thank You for Smoking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:11, 24 November 2016

Wall Street Private Equity Group Inc filed for bankruptcy in October 2012. It wasn’t dismissed in bankruptcy until this month. None of its current employees have ever completed a merger of consequence by themselves. Wall Street Private Equity emerged from bankruptcy with only a fraction of its cash left and no immediate major acquisition transactions pending.

Their Vice President Steven Blum (real name Steven Blumberg) was arrested last year for beating his wife and instead of incarceration spent several months taking anger management classes and received probation. Mr. Blum has told various individuals that his wife was having an affair with the handyman in his condominium complex and that impacted on his actions. Mr. Blumberg was sued by his condominium seeking eviction for nonpayment and other related matters.

If you ask the individuals at Wall Street Private Equity to give you a dozen references of mergers that they personally completed without anyone else’s involvement or support they won’t be able to give you even one.

The company formed Business Sold by Owner and sold more than 100 very small companies a program and in general abandoned providing services to them causing numerous unhappy clients.

Mr. Calabria joined Wall Street Private Equity in 2011 as a part time bookkeeper making between $12-$15 an hour. By changing all of the bank accounts over to his name as well as the name of all of the stock certificates, he convinced the bankruptcy judge that he had the right to file the petition. Mr. Calabria is an older man in his 60’s with health problems.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Wall Street Private Equity Group Inc filed for bankruptcy in October 2012. It wasn’t dismissed in bankruptcy until this month. None of its current employees have ever completed a merger of consequence by themselves. Wall Street Private Equity emerged from bankruptcy with only a fraction of its cash left and no immediate major acquisition transactions pending.
-{{About|the film|the novel it is based upon|Thank You for Smoking (novel)}}
-{{Infobox film
-| name           = Thank You for Smoking
-| image          = Thank you for smoking Poster.jpg
-| alt            = A parody of the Uncle Sam poster with the head replaced with a cigarette top
-| caption        = Theatrical release poster
-| director       = [[Jason Reitman]]
-| producer       = [[David O. Sacks]]
-| screenplay     = Jason Reitman
-| based on       = {{Based on|''[[Thank You for Smoking (novel)|Thank You for Smoking]]''|[[Christopher Buckley (novelist)|Christopher Buckley]]}}
-| starring       = [[Aaron Eckhart]]<br />[[Maria Bello]]<br />[[Cameron Bright]]<br />[[Adam Brody]]<br />[[Sam Elliott]]<br />[[Katie Holmes]]<br />[[David Koechner]]<br />[[Rob Lowe]]<br />[[William H. Macy]]<br />[[J. K. Simmons]]<br />[[Robert Duvall]]<!-- per poster billing block -->
-| music = [[Rolfe Kent]]
-| cinematography = James Whitaker
-| editing        = [[Dana E. Glauberman]]
-| studio         = Room 9 Entertainment<br />ContentFilm
-| distributor    = [[Fox Searchlight Pictures]]
-| released       = {{Film date|2005|09|09|[[2005 Toronto International Film Festival|TIFF]]|2006|03|17|United States}}
-| runtime        = 92 minutes<ref name="boxofficemojo.com">http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=thankyouforsmoking.htm</ref>
-| country        = United States
-| language       = English
-| budget         = $10 million<ref name="Waxman"/>
-| gross          = $39.3 million<ref name="boxofficemojo.com"/>
-}}
-'''''Thank You for Smoking'''''  is a 2006 [[Comedy-drama|comedy-drama film]] written and directed by [[Jason Reitman]] and starring [[Aaron Eckhart]], based on the 1994 [[satirical]] [[Thank You for Smoking (novel)|novel of the same name]] by [[Christopher Buckley (novelist)|Christopher Buckley]]. It follows the efforts of [[Big Tobacco]]'s chief spokesman, Nick Naylor, who lobbies on behalf of cigarettes using heavy [[Spin (public relations)|spin tactics]] while also trying to remain a role model for his 12-year-old son. [[Maria Bello]], [[Adam Brody]], [[Sam Elliott]], [[Katie Holmes]], [[Rob Lowe]], [[William H. Macy]], [[J. K. Simmons]], and [[Robert Duvall]] appear in supporting roles.
+Their Vice President Steven Blum (real name Steven Blumberg) was arrested last year for beating his wife and instead of incarceration spent several months taking anger management classes and received probation. Mr. Blum has told various individuals that his wife was having an affair with the handyman in his condominium complex and that impacted on his actions. Mr. Blumberg was sued by his condominium seeking eviction for nonpayment and other related matters.
-The film was released in a [[Limited release|limited run]] on March 17, 2006, and had a [[wide release]] on April 14. As of 2007, the film has grossed a total of more than $39 million worldwide.<ref>{{cite web | title=Weekend Box Office | work=BoxOfficeMojo.com | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=thankyouforsmoking.htm| accessdate=May 7, 2006}}</ref> The film was released on DVD in the US on October 3, 2006, and in the UK on January 8, 2007.
+If you ask the individuals at Wall Street Private Equity to give you a dozen references of mergers that they personally completed without anyone else’s involvement or support they won’t be able to give you even one.
-==Plot==
-Nick Naylor is a handsome, smooth-talking tobacco [[lobbying|lobbyist]] and the [[vice-president]] of a [[tobacco politics|tobacco lobby]] called the "Academy of Tobacco Studies", which for 15 years has been "researching" the link between [[tobacco smoking]] and [[lung cancer]]. They claim that their research—funded primarily by tobacco companies—has found no definitive evidence of any linkage. Naylor's job consists mainly of reporting the questionable research of the "Academy" to the public and defending [[Big Tobacco]] on television programs by questioning opposing health claims and advocating personal choice. Naylor and his friends, firearm lobbyist Bobby Jay Bliss and alcohol lobbyist Polly Bailey, meet every week and jokingly call themselves the "Merchants of Death" or "The MOD Squad".
+The company formed Business Sold by Owner and sold more than 100 very small companies a program and in general abandoned providing services to them causing numerous unhappy clients.
-As anti-tobacco campaigns mount and numbers of young smokers decline, Naylor suggests that [[product placement]] of cigarettes could once again boost cigarette sales. Naylor's boss, BR, sends Naylor to [[Los Angeles]] to bargain for cigarette placement in upcoming movies. Naylor takes along his young son Joey in hopes of bonding with him. The next day, Naylor is sent to meet with Lorne Lutch, the [[cancer]]-stricken man who once played the [[Marlboro Man]] in cigarette ads and is now campaigning against cigarettes.  As his son watches, Naylor successfully offers Lutch a suitcase of money for his silence. During the drive back, Nick and Joey discuss the beauty of argument.
+Mr. Calabria joined Wall Street Private Equity in 2011 as a part time bookkeeper making between $12-$15 an hour. By changing all of the bank accounts over to his name as well as the name of all of the stock certificates, he convinced the bankruptcy judge that he had the right to file the petition. Mr. Calabria is an older man in his 60’s with health problems.
-Senator Finistirre, one of Naylor's most vehement critics, is the promoter of a bill to add a [[Skull and crossbones (poison)|skull and crossbones POISON warning]] to cigarette packaging. During a televised debate with Finistirre, Naylor receives a death threat from a caller. Despite the threat, Naylor still plans to appear before a [[U.S. Senate]] committee to fight Finistirre's bill. Naylor is then kidnapped and covered in [[nicotine patch]]es. Awakening in a hospital, he learns that the very high nicotine tolerance level resulting from his smoking has saved him from death by [[nicotine poisoning]], but now he is [[Hypersensitivity|hypersensitive]] to nicotine and can never smoke again.
-Meanwhile, Naylor has been seduced by a young reporter named Heather Holloway. During their steamy fling, the besotted Naylor tells Holloway all about his life and career—information that she happily publishes in an exposé that appears just after the kidnapping. Her article relentlessly bashes Naylor and his work, exposing Lutch's bribe, the product-placement scheme, and the MOD squad. It accuses Naylor of training his son Joey to follow his amoral example. All public sympathy due to Naylor's kidnapping evaporates, and Naylor is fired by BR.
-Naylor falls into depression until Joey helps him recall the integrity in his job of defending corporations that almost no one feels deserve a defense. Rejuvenated, Naylor tells the press about his affair with Holloway and promises to clear the names of everyone mentioned in her article. He also declares that he will still appear before the Senate committee. At the hearing, Naylor admits to the dangers of smoking but argues that public awareness is already high enough without extra warnings. He emphasizes consumer choice and responsibility and, to the dismay of Senator Finistirre, claims that if tobacco companies are guilty of tobacco-related deaths, then perhaps Finistirre's state of [[Vermont]], as a major cheese producer, is likewise guilty of [[cholesterol]]-related deaths.
-BR congratulates Naylor on the speech and offers him his old job but Naylor has a change of heart. Seeing Big Tobacco [[Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement|settling claims of liability]], Naylor remarks that he has left just in time. He also mentions Heather was humiliated upon being terminated by the paper for her article and is working as a weather reporter on a local news station. Naylor supports his son's newfound interest in debating and opens a private lobbying firm. The MOD squad continues to meet with new members that represent the fast-food, oil, and biohazard industries. As he consults cellphone industry representatives concerned about [[Mobile phone radiation and health|claims that cellphones cause brain cancer]], he narrates: "[[Michael Jordan]] plays ball. [[Charles Manson]] kills people. I talk. Everyone has a talent."
-==Cast==
-* [[Aaron Eckhart]] as Nick Naylor, spokesmen for the Academy of Tobacco Studies
-* [[Cameron Bright]] as Joey Naylor, Nick's son
-* [[Katie Holmes]] as Heather Holloway, a reporter for the Washington Probe
-* [[Maria Bello]] as Polly Bailey, a spokeswoman for the alcohol industry.
-* [[David Koechner]] as Bobby Jay Bliss, a spokesman for  S.A.F.E.T.Y ('''S'''ociety for the '''A'''dvancement of '''F'''irearms and '''E'''ffective '''T'''raining for '''Y'''outh).
-* [[William H. Macy]] as Senator Ortolan Finistirre
-* [[Robert Duvall]] as the Captain, founder of The Academy for Tobacco Studies
-* [[J. K. Simmons]] as "BR", Nick's boss
-* [[Marianne Muellerleile]] as Joey's school teacher
-* [[Kim Dickens]] as Jill Naylor, Nick's ex-wife
-* [[Rob Lowe]] as Jeff Megall, a Hollywood super-agent
-* [[Adam Brody]] as Jack, Jeff Megell's assistant
-* [[Sam Elliott]] as Lorne Lutch, the original [[Marlboro Man]]
-* [[Todd Louiso]] as Ron Goode
-* [[Dennis Miller]] as Himself
-Director Jason Reitman asked many of his prospective actors and actresses to be in the film by writing each of them a personal letter. Every one of his first choices accepted his or her part and most thanked Reitman for his letter. Reitman was also able to persuade Eckhart, Holmes, Macy, and Lowe to sign on to the film with minimum pay.<ref name="Sutherland"/>
-==Production==
-[[Mel Gibson]]'s [[Icon Productions]] bought the rights to Buckley's novel prior to its release. Initially, Gibson saw himself as starring as Nick Naylor in the adaptation.<ref name= "Waxman">{{cite news | last = Waxman | first = Sharon | coauthors = | title = The Son Also Directs | work = [[The New York Times]] | pages = B9 | language = | publisher = | date = September 10, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 25, 2006 }}</ref> However, due to the satiric nature of the book, the studio lacked a way to film it and the project lacked a usable script.<ref name="Turan, Kenneth">{{cite web| url=http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/turan/cl-et-smoking17mar17,0,923325.story | title='Thank You for Smoking'| author=Turan, Kenneth  | work=[[Los Angeles Times]] | date=March 17, 2006}}</ref> Reitman became interested in heading an adaptation after reading the book, and independently wrote a draft for Icon executives after he discovered they owned the rights to the film. Reitman saw himself as a comic writer with a voice similar to Buckley's, and consciously attempted to maintain the satiric flavor of the book for his draft.<ref name= "Harrison">{{cite news | last = Harrison| first = Eric| coauthors = | title = Taking on Tobacco | work = [[The Houston Chronicle]] | pages = 10 | language = | publisher = | date = March 30, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 25, 2010 }}</ref> The script was received favorably by Icon, and Gibson called Reitman to tell him how much he loved it.<ref name="Waxman"/> But over the next three years, the project languished due to a lack of financing and big studio interest, as most studios wanted Reitman to rewrite his script to include a more anti-smoking and uplifting ending. According to Reitman, studios wanted Naylor to have a change of heart by the film's end and repent for his past.<ref name= "Sutherland">{{cite news | last = Sutherland| first = Claire| coauthors = | title = Reitman smokes out studio | work = [[Herald Sun (Australia)]] | pages = I18 | language = | publisher = | date = August 31, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 28, 2006 }}</ref>
-It was only after meeting [[David O. Sacks]], who had made his fortune as the former COO of the Internet payment company [[PayPal]], that Reitman found a financier for his script. A first-time producer, Sacks spent over a year trying to acquire the rights to the film from Icon. He financed most of the film's $8.5 million budget and let Reitman keep most of his original draft.<ref name="Waxman"/> The project marked Reitman's first feature-length film as a director, though he previously directed short films and commercials and had worked on the set of his father, director [[Ivan Reitman]].
-During the filming, Reitman made the conscious decision not to show any actual smoking of cigarettes. The only scenes that include smoking are older films the characters watch, such as when [[John Wayne]] lights up in ''[[Sands of Iwo Jima]]''.
-Before the film was screened at the Sundance Film Festival, internet rumors claimed that an extended nudity scene between Eckhart and Holmes had been cut down due to pressure from Holmes' husband, [[Tom Cruise]]. Reitman and executives denied that such a scene had ever existed but welcomed the publicity it garnered for the film. Reitman later said that "Half the questions that I've been getting are thoughtful questions about the moral of lobbying and how does satire work. And the rest is just, 'Is there actually any nude footage out there?'"<ref name= "Rea">{{cite news | last = Rea| first = Steven| coauthors = | title = He'll take publicity--good, off-the-wall--thanks much | work = [[The Philadelphia Inquirer]] | pages = H02 | language = | publisher = | date = March 19, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 25, 2010 }}</ref>
-Controversy also erupted after the film was screened at the Toronto Film Festival. ''Thank You for Smoking'' was met with tremendous popular reception and afterward disputed claims emerged as to who had signed a distribution deal with Sacks. [[Fox Searchlight Pictures]] and [[Paramount Vantage|Paramount Classics]] both issued competing press releases claiming that they had secured rights for the film's distribution. Sacks later claimed that he never reached a firm deal with Paramount, and noted that Fox Searchlight had offered $7 million for distribution, while Paramount Classics offered $6.7 million. Allegedly, Sacks called Paramount at 1:15&nbsp;a.m. saying he was uncomfortable with their initial deal. Ruth Vitale, co-president of Paramount Classics said "He can't resell the film" and noted "I can only think that because of his naiveté and inexperience he would do this."<ref name="Waxman"/>
-==Release==
-===Critical reception===
-The film received mostly positive reviews from film critics. Film-review aggregator [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reports that 86% of 174 critics have given the film a positive review, with a [[weighted mean|rating average]] of 7.3 out of 10.  The site's general consensus is that "Delightfully unscrupulous characters and searing cynicism prick all sides of the anti-smoking issue with hilarity and intelligence."<ref>
-{{cite web
-| url = http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thank_you_for_smoking/
-| title=Thank You for Smoking (2006)
-| work = Rotten Tomatoes
-| publisher = IGN Entertainment
-| accessdate = December 25, 2009
-}}
-</ref> [[Metacritic]], which assigns a [[standard score|normalized]] rating out of 100 to reviews from film critics, has a rating score of 71 based on 36 reviews.<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web
-| title = Thank You for Smoking (2006): Reviews
-| url = http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/thankyouforsmoking
-| publisher = [[CNET Networks]]
-| work = [[Metacritic]]
-| accessdate = December 25, 2009
-}}
-</ref> [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' describing it as "acutely hilarious" and gave the film 3.5 out of 4 stars.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/7622069/review/9440863/thank_you_for_smoking | title=Thank You for Smoking (review) | author=Travers, Peter | work=[[Rolling Stone]] | date=March 7, 2006}}</ref> ''[[USA Today]]'' film critic Claudia Puig called it a "razor-sharp satire" that was "the wittiest dark comedy of the year thus far. It has appeal to all sides of the political spectrum." She praised the film for a "quirky and intelligent rarity that elicits wry smiles and hearty laughs alike" and compared it in tone to ''[[Election (1999 film)|Election]]'' (1999).<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2006-03-16-thank-you-smoking_x.htm | title='Thank You for Smoking' is a breath of fresh air | author=Puig, Claudia | work=[[USA Today]] | date=March 16, 2006}}</ref> [[Kenneth Turan]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' also favorably reviewed the film, calling it a "very smart and funny movie" that had been "shrewdly" adapted to film from novel.<ref name="Turan, Kenneth"/>
-===Box office performance===
-''Thank You for Smoking'' initially opened at the box office in the U.S. as a limited release in just five theaters, and grossed $262,923 in its debut weekend for an average of $52,584 per theater, making it one of the top 100 average gross per theater films of all time. The film was later released in 1,015 theaters across the U.S. on April 14, 2006, and has gone on to gross $24,793,509 domestically and $14,529,518 outside the country, for a total of $39,323,027 worldwide. The highest it ever rated at the North American box office was #8 on the weekend of its wide release.<ref>{{cite web | title = Box Office Mojo: 'Thank You for Smoking' | work = [[Box Office Mojo]] | url = http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=thankyouforsmoking.htm | accessdate = 2010-04-28 }}</ref> Although the film's box office performance was excellent for Reitman's directorial debut, it paled in comparison with his next two films, ''[[Juno (film)|Juno]]'' and ''[[Up in the Air (2009 film)|Up in the Air]]'', both of which went on to make well over $150,000,000 worldwide.<ref>{{cite web | title = The Numbers: 'Jason Reitman' | work = The Numbers | url = http://www.the-numbers.com/people/directors/0JRTM.php | accessdate = 2010-04-28 }}</ref>
-===Criticism===
-The main contention most critics had with the film was its lack of continuity. [[Karina Longworth]] of Cinematical notes "''Thank You for Smoking'' has a vague emotional arc, but narratively it plays out like a constellation of sitcom sketches, connected by the most tenuous threads of character evolution",<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.cinematical.com/2006/01/22/sundance-review-thank-you-for-smoking/ | title= Sundance Review: Thank You For Smoking | author=Longworth, Karina | work=Cinematical | date=January 22, 2006}}</ref> while ''[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]]'' observes "the problem's not so much with the movie's aim, as with the number of targets it's aiming at."<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=133712| title= Thank You For Smoking | author=Jolin, Dan | work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]] | accessdate=April 28, 2010}}</ref> Other reviewers criticized the film's overacting. Manhola Dargis of ''[[The New York Times]]'' notes "although he [Reitman] steers his cast through its paces with facility, he tends to oversell jokes that were already plenty loud in the book."<ref name="Dargis, Manhola">{{cite news | url=http://movies.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/movies/17smok.html | title= Thank You for Smoking (2005) | author=Dargis, Manhola | work=[[New York Times]] | date=March 17, 2006}}</ref> Other comments come from ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'': "While often entertaining, the film keeps hitting the same comic notes",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001843042 |title=Thank You for Smoking |work=[[Hollywood Reporter]] |date=December 27, 2005 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070418141730/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001843042 |archivedate=April 18, 2007 }}</ref> and [[Salon.com|Salon]]: "The actors here are entertaining enough to watch, even if they sometimes seem to be taking their mission (whatever they think it is) a bit too seriously."<ref name="Zacharek, Stephanie">{{cite web | url=http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2006/03/17/smoking/index.html | title= Thank You for Smoking | author=Zacharek, Stephanie | work=[[Salon.com]] | date=March 17, 2006}}</ref>
-While ''Thank You for Smoking'' the book was praised as a sharp criticism of both anti-smoking lobbyists and the tobacco industry, the film has received more mixed reviews on its satirical content. Steve Palopoli of ''[[Metro Silicon Valley]]'' writes that "no matter" how much the hype machine might hard-sell the idea that the movie 'skewers both sides of the issue', "any child old enough to recognize Joe Camel can tell that underneath the sarcastic joking, this is a bitterly anti-smoking film."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.metroactive.com/metro-santa-cruz/03.29.06/smoking-0613.html | title= The New Insincerity | author=Palopoli, Steve | work=[[Metro Silicon Valley]] | date=March 29, 2006}}</ref> Palopoli goes on to say "the supposed case against the anti-smoking lobby has been reduced mostly to some limp jokes at the expense of William H. Macy's senator character, who is fervently against the tobacco lobby". Many felt the film's relatively sappy ending negated the slicker, darker tone of the book. ''[[The Washington Post]]''{{'}}s Desson Thomson thought that "as written and directed by Jason Reitman, 'Smoking' is filtered too heavily with moral redemption."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/thank-you-for-smoking,1115743/critic-review.html#reviewNum1 | title= Thank You for Smoking | author=Thomson, Desson | work=[[The Washington Post]] | accessdate=April 28, 2010}}</ref>
-Reitman has maintained his purpose was to match the tone and satirical message of the book as closely as possible. "What I wanted people to think about was political correctness. I wanted them to think about ideas of personal responsibility and personal choice. I think cigarettes are a wonderful location for that discussion because cigarettes are something we know all the answers to", he posits. "I wanted to look into this idea of why we feel the need to tell each other how to live and why we can't take personal responsibility for our own actions when we fall ill from things that we know are dangerous."<ref>{{cite web| title = Thank You For Smoking Interview | publisher = abc.net.au | url = http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/txt/s1714051.htm | date=August 16, 2006}}</ref> [[Stephanie Zacharek]] of [[Salon.com|Salon]] agrees with Reitman; "Despite its title, the movie doesn't come packaged with a strong anti-smoking message, because it doesn't need to: Everyone knows that smoking is bad for you, including people who continue to do it."<ref name="Zacharek, Stephanie"/>
-There is no point during the film at which any of the characters smoke. Dargis of ''The New York Times'' unwittingly states, "''Thank You for Smoking'' is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes mild violence, discreet sex and, of course, countless cigarettes."<ref name="Dargis, Manhola"/> In the film, even Robert Duvall's filtered cigarette maverick "The Captain" is shown repeatedly drinking [[mint julep]]s rather than smoking cigarettes. Some critics argue that Reitman's reluctance to show the characters smoking is further confirmation of the film's anti-smoking stance. Reitman has issued statements disagreeing with this view. He said in an interview that "While it's not anti-smoking, it's very important people don't think that this is a pro-smoking movie. It's about freedom of choice."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.seattlepi.com/movies/264502_reitman28.html | title='Smoking' director bucked trends for political satire | author=Axmaker, Sean| work=[[Seattle Post Intelligencer]] | date=March 28, 2006}}</ref> Buckley said about the decision to omit smoking that "[I]t was very deliberate, and I think rather cool."<ref name= "Bosman">{{cite news | last = Bosman| first = Julie| coauthors = | title = For Tobacco, Stealth Marketing is the Norm| work = [[The New York Times]] | pages = C4 | language = | publisher = | date = March 10, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 25, 2010 }}</ref>
-===Industry reaction===
-The tobacco industry itself has been reluctant to take any sides or comment on the film. When ''[[New York Times]]'' reporter Michael Jankowsky contacted an [[Altria]] publicist about the tobacco giant's reaction, she "hesitated to respond, insisting that the film looks dated and poorly reflects the industry with depictions of tobacco executives as highly paid sleazeballs."<ref name= "Jankowsky">{{cite news | last = Jankowsky| first = Michael| coauthors = | title = Thank You For O.K.’ing Addiction | work = [[New York Times]] | pages = A4 | language = | publisher = | date = April 2, 2006 | url = | accessdate = April 28, 2010 }}</ref> Though ''Thank You for Smoking'' pokes fun at the industry, the novel it was adapted from is a much harsher critic of tobacco lobbyists, and the major tobacco companies have mostly kept quiet on the issue.
-==Awards==
-''Thank You for Smoking'' did not receive a wide variety of nominations from the major award circuits; however, it did garner two [[Golden Globe Award|Golden Globe]] nominations in its year for Best Picture (Musical or Comedy) and Best Actor in the same film genre for Aaron Eckhart's portrayal of Nick Naylor. The Broadcast Film Association recognized [[Cameron Bright]] for his performance as Joey with a nomination for Best Young Actor, and also gave the film itself a nomination in the Comedy category. [[Jason Reitman]] received the Best Directorial Debut award from the [[National Board of Review of Motion Pictures]].<ref>
-{{cite web
-| title = Thank You for Smoking (2006): Awards
-| url = http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427944/awards
-| work = IMDB
-| accessdate = April 13, 2010
-}}
-</ref>
-==Soundtrack==
-{{Infobox album <!-- See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums -->
-| Name        = Thank You for Smoking (Music from the Motion Picture)
-| Type        = [[Soundtrack]]
-| Artist      = Various artists
-| Cover       =
-| Released    = April 18, 2006
-| Recorded    = Various times
-| Genre       = Soundtrack
-| Length      = 38:02
-| Label       = [[Lakeshore Records]]
-}}
-{{Album ratings
-| rev1 =[[Allmusic]]
-| rev1Score = {{Rating|4|5}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allmusic.com/album/thank-you-for-smoking-mw0000436171|title=Thank You for Smoking Original Soundtrack review|accessdate=September 22, 2012|last=Monger|first=James Christopher|work=[[Allmusic]]|publisher =[[Rovi Corporation]]}}</ref>
-}}
-The ''Thank You for Smoking'' soundtrack was released April 14, 2006 and the CD came out on April 18, 2006. The first nine tracks are popular songs about smoking taken from the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. The famous track "[[Smoke! Smoke! Smoke! (That Cigarette)]]" opens the film. The final four tracks are instrumentals from the original score of Rolfe Kent, who had been nominated for best original score for his work on ''[[Sideways]]''. AllMusic wrote that "The thread is obvious, but the selections sound handpicked rather than researched solely on the basis of their subject matter." Other critics have called the soundtrack "demented."<ref name= "Braun">{{cite news|last=Braun|first=Liz|title =Smoke Screen; Film's Dark Humour Brilliantly Enlightens Us on the Art of Spin|work=[[The Toronto Sun]]|pages=E8| date=March 24, 2006|url=|accessdate=April 25, 2010}}</ref>
-# "[[Smoke! Smoke! Smoke! (That Cigarette)]]" ([[Tex Williams]]) – 2:54
-# "Smoke Rings" ([[The Mills Brothers]]) – 2:55
-# "Greenback Dollar" ([[The Kingston Trio]]) – 2:52
-# "Little Organ Fugue" ([[The Swingle Singers]]) – 2:23
-# "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" ([[The Platters]]) – 2:40
-# "Three Cigarettes in an Ashtray" ([[Patsy Cline]]) – 2:16
-# "Cigarettes and Whisky" ([[Ramblin' Jack Elliott]]) – 2:02
-# "Cigarettes and Coffee" ([[Otis Redding]]) – 3:52
-# "Another Puff" ([[Jerry Reed]]) – 4:06
-# "Intro & Tobacco One" ([[Rolfe Kent]]) – 3:02
-# "Donate It & Sex Back in Cigarettes" (Rolfe Kent) – 3:01
-# "Joey & Drums of Doom" (Rolfe Kent) – 2:59
-# "Spanish Epilogue Revisited" (Rolfe Kent) – 3:00
-# "[[Wind of Change (Scorpions song)|Wind of Change]]" ([[Scorpions (band)|Scorpions]]) – 5:11
-==Home media==
-The [[DVD]] was released on October 3, 2006 by 20th Century Fox, with both a widescreen and fullscreen edition. Each DVD contains two commentaries, one exclusively with Reitman and another with Reitman, Eckhart, and Koechner. Other extras include thirteen deleted scenes, a Charlie Rose interview, a making-of featurette, an "America: Living in Spin" featureette, a poster gallery, and an art gallery.  The film has not yet been released on [[Blu-ray Disc|Blu-ray]].
-==Proposed television series==
-''Variety'' reported on November 24, 2006 that [[NBC]] planned to create a television series based on the film.<ref>{{cite web | title=NBC Gets in 'Smoking' Habit | work=Zap2It.com | url=http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-nbcthankyouforsmoking,0,1387008.story| accessdate=November 24, 2006}}</ref> Sacks headed the adaptation as executive producer, with Rick Cleveland attached as head writer. After NBC passed on the project, it was brought to NBC's cable network, [[USA Network|USA]]. James Dodson was set up as head writer as well as co-executive producer alongside Sacks. USA's chief programming executive Jeff Wachtel initially described the character as living between the morally ambiguous character of the film and Robin Hood.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117973595.html?categoryid=14&cs=1 | title=USA lights 'Smoking' spinoff | author=Adalian, Josef| work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date=October 7, 2007}}</ref> The series planned to adopt a different title and sought to start where the movie left off. The project never materialized and no official series of the movie has since developed.  However, ABC's show ''[[Better Off Ted]]'' has been described as a "TV-sized version of ''Thank You for Smoking''".<ref name= "Deggans">{{cite news | last = Deggans| first = Eric| coauthors = | title = Networks Missing the Mark | work = [[St. Petersburg Times]] | pages = 2E | language = | publisher = | date = February 22, 2009 | url = | accessdate = April 25, 2010 }}</ref>
-==References==
-{{Reflist|30em}}
-==External links==
-{{wikiquote}}
-* {{official website|http://www.foxsearchlight.com/thankyouforsmoking/}}
-* {{IMDb title|0427944|Thank You for Smoking}}
-* {{AllRovi movie|322629|Thank You for Smoking}}
-* {{rotten Tomatoes|thank_you_for_smoking|Thank You for Smoking}}
-* {{metacritic film|thank-you-for-smoking|Thank You for Smoking}}
-* {{mojo title|thankyouforsmoking|Thank You for Smoking}}
-{{Jason Reitman}}
-{{Christopher Buckley}}
-{{Authority control}}
-{{DEFAULTSORT:Thank You For Smoking}}
-[[Category:2005 films]]
-[[Category:2000s comedy-drama films]]
-[[Category:American films]]
-[[Category:American comedy-drama films]]
-[[Category:American political satire films]]
-[[Category:English-language films]]
-[[Category:Films directed by Jason Reitman]]
-[[Category:Directorial debut films]]
-[[Category:Films based on American novels]]
-[[Category:Films set in the 1990s]]
-[[Category:Films about smoking]]
-[[Category:Films set in Washington, D.C.]]
-[[Category:Films shot in multiple formats]]
-[[Category:Films shot in California]]
-[[Category:Films shot in Washington, D.C.]]
-[[Category:Films shot in North Carolina]]
-[[Category:American independent films]]
-[[Category:Fox Searchlight Pictures films]]
-[[Category:Works about public relations]]
-[[Category:Screenplays by Jason Reitman]]