Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consortiumnews: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Consortiumnews. (TW) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Consortiumnews}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Consortiumnews}}) |
||
A news service. This article was speedily deleted per [[WP:A7]] (no assertion of notability). The subsequent discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 November 28]] decided to refer the article to AfD to determine the topic's notability. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
A news service. This article was speedily deleted per [[WP:A7]] (no assertion of notability). The subsequent discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 November 28]] decided to refer the article to AfD to determine the topic's notability. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' There does not seem to be secondary coverage that says anything about it. It's just other news sites quoting it or in one case recommending readers make a donation.[[User:Kitfoxxe|Kitfoxxe]] ([[User talk:Kitfoxxe|talk]]) 17:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:04, 6 December 2016
Consortiumnews
- Consortiumnews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A news service. This article was speedily deleted per WP:A7 (no assertion of notability). The subsequent discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 November 28 decided to refer the article to AfD to determine the topic's notability. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. Sandstein 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There does not seem to be secondary coverage that says anything about it. It's just other news sites quoting it or in one case recommending readers make a donation.Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)