Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Huff: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Crystal Huff. (TW) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Crystal Huff}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Crystal Huff}}) |
||
NN person whose sole claim to fame is that she chairs science fiction conventions. PROD contested on the ground of "Improved sourcing of article," but that seems to constitute nothing beyond "adding yet more obscure sources of unproven reliability that don't do much more than mention the subject's name." In any event, they certainly don't meet the GNG and are no improvement upon the primary sources and mere namedrops already cited in the article. [[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''']] 06:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
NN person whose sole claim to fame is that she chairs science fiction conventions. PROD contested on the ground of "Improved sourcing of article," but that seems to constitute nothing beyond "adding yet more obscure sources of unproven reliability that don't do much more than mention the subject's name." In any event, they certainly don't meet the GNG and are no improvement upon the primary sources and mere namedrops already cited in the article. [[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''']] 06:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Notability not asserted in article. [[User:Kitfoxxe|Kitfoxxe]] ([[User talk:Kitfoxxe|talk]]) 09:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:42, 18 December 2016
- Crystal Huff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN person whose sole claim to fame is that she chairs science fiction conventions. PROD contested on the ground of "Improved sourcing of article," but that seems to constitute nothing beyond "adding yet more obscure sources of unproven reliability that don't do much more than mention the subject's name." In any event, they certainly don't meet the GNG and are no improvement upon the primary sources and mere namedrops already cited in the article. Ravenswing 06:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Notability not asserted in article. Kitfoxxe (talk) 09:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)