Jump to content

User talk:Ramaksoud2000: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rasumohan (talk | contribs)
Line 52: Line 52:
:I don't believe it's necessary when it's so obvious, but it doesn't really matter. It would be deleted under the other two criteria anyway. [[User:Ramaksoud2000|Ramaksoud2000]] <sup>('''[[User talk:Ramaksoud2000|Talk to me]]''')</sup> 05:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
:I don't believe it's necessary when it's so obvious, but it doesn't really matter. It would be deleted under the other two criteria anyway. [[User:Ramaksoud2000|Ramaksoud2000]] <sup>('''[[User talk:Ramaksoud2000|Talk to me]]''')</sup> 05:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
::I agree. I almost added it myself. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 05:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
::I agree. I almost added it myself. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 05:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

== Query regarding deletion of page ==

Dear,

Please list the problems found in 'WaSSIP Badulla' page for improvement.

Revision as of 10:14, 21 December 2016

I don't see a better place to post this so I am putting it here. It does appear that this file should be deleted. My assumption that an art work in a public place can be copied and distributed without restriction appears to be wrong. Sorry. I wonder how Google is able to publish unedited street views.

No worries. It's complicated. Thank you for coming here. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Privacy policy

Please read and try to understand Wikipedia:Privacy policy. You should never reveal the actual name of an author who uses a nick name. Maintaining anonymity is one of the highest privileges of Wikipedians, and this should never be compromised. Therefore, the box in the article says Cryptically "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." and is not as blunt and open as your wording, although it actually means the same. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You identify yourself on your user page with an image of yourself. That same image is used in the autobiography, and that image description, as well as the bio, both of which you created, contain your real name. If you don't want to be identified, then don't self-identify. Or are you talking about just not identifying you in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Kallee? You can't pick and choose where you wish to identify on Wikipedia, especially if you just want your arguments to hold more weight in discussions. Please see WP:OUTING. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments and the more appropriate link to WP:OUTING. I conclude that we both must proceed with sensitivity and caution on this case. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A.M.W. Stirling photo

I saw your message about the photo of A.M.W. Stirling. That was eight years ago, and things were looser then about permission, but as I recall, I had emailed the De Morgan Foundation for permission, which they granted with attribution. I'm not sure a formal template even existed at the time to verify the obtaining of permission.

I've not been involved with the day-to-day business of Wikipedia for a couple of years, and sadly lack the time to immerse myself in reviewing procedures. I don't know whether there are folks currently devoted to preserving content who might want to obtain permission from the Foundation. Thanks, Cynwolfe (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I checked and WP:PERMISSION has existed for a while, but it's certainly not a problem. I will e-mail the Foundation. Take care, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cynwolfe, to update, I contacted the Foundation that day, and they said they would look into it with their copyright lawyers, but I have not received a final response. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:5 Heads Humbert Wolfe + Padgett .JPG

Hi,

Please could you explain to me what I need to do to avoid your deletions as my File:5 Heads Humbert Wolfe + Padgett .JPG was completely my copyright but was speedily deleted on the grounds that it wasn't.

Many thanks

Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.44.14 (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony. The image was previously published on the Internet, so please fill out this interactive form. This will generate a statement, allowing your image to be redistributed, that you must send to the e-mail given. It is important that the e-mail comes from an e-mail address associated with the place where it was previously published on the Internet to verify that you created the image. If you're interested in learning more about the process, you can visit Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about a G5 on that but I didn't want to add it until the SPI closed. Meters (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it's necessary when it's so obvious, but it doesn't really matter. It would be deleted under the other two criteria anyway. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I almost added it myself. Meters (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding deletion of page

Dear,

Please list the problems found in 'WaSSIP Badulla' page for improvement.