Talk:Burn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:31, 27 December 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Burn article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Template:Vital article

Burn has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 19, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Burn.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Dermatology / Translation GA‑class Top‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Anus are not genitalia

Anus are not genitalia as pictured in the diagram of the lady ("Genitalia 1%" pointing at both her vagina and anus/sphincter). (unsigned comment by 92.2.43.2 on 23 August 2014‎)

I think that you're technically right, it is considered an erogenous zone, however. It may be that in the case of a burn their proximity is enough that both are considered. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 04:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Anus are not genitalia ==
-Anus are not genitalia as pictured in the diagram of the lady ("Genitalia 1%" pointing at both her vagina and anus/sphincter).
+Anus are not genitalia as pictured in the diagram of the lady ("Genitalia 1%" pointing at both her vagina and anus/sphincter). (unsigned comment by 92.2.43.2 on 23 August 2014‎)
+:I think that you're technically right, it is considered an erogenous zone, however.  It may be that in the case of a burn their proximity is enough that both are considered. [[Special:Contributions/76.10.128.192|76.10.128.192]] ([[User talk:76.10.128.192|talk]]) 04:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)