Jump to content

User talk:MatthewVanitas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Zonneroos - "→‎Review: new section"
Line 109: Line 109:
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-afc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Zupotachyon|Zupotachyon]] <small>Ping me</small>{{#if:Ping me||[[Category:Pages using small with an empty input parameter]]}} ([[User talk:Zupotachyon|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Zupotachyon|contribs]]) 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-afc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Zupotachyon|Zupotachyon]] <small>Ping me</small>{{#if:Ping me||[[Category:Pages using small with an empty input parameter]]}} ([[User talk:Zupotachyon|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Zupotachyon|contribs]]) 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


== Draft:Sukuma calendar (2) ==
== Draft:Sukuma calendar and Draft:Sukuma calendar (2) ==


Dear MatthewVanitas,
Dear MatthewVanitas,

Revision as of 16:59, 2 January 2017

Template:Archive box collapsible

Hi. I just reposted info for the Euroclearability definition. I hope it helps. I presume I recheck this thread to see a response as it's all public...?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.208 (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11:48:14, 19 November 2016 review of submission by Chrismacrae


Quarter Bilion Girls - this was launched at un at smae time as wikipedia launched herstory - there is no difference of process in building what herstiory or quarterbilliongirls represent- why do you favor insuders when the whole point of this unlaunch was to enourage wider contributions to wikipedia

09:00:26, 24 November 2016 review of submission by 223.31.55.162


Hi, there is a Official source to name The Voice Project for Atena Daemi

I don't understand English more, and I want of you (( If you know the complete rules of how to work with Wikipedia )) that please add this resource and text about Atena Daemi in this article (Atena Daemi).

Source Address http://voiceproject.org/takeaction/drop-the-charges-against-atena-daemi

There are References here:

Thank you. --Aliresajavann (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Just a quick note to say thank you for taking the time to review my article submission request.

Kind regards.

Bedmonds2017 (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bahramaryana.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bahramaryana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for reviewing my article on Hale kesare within seconds of its creation. Regards, Prof TPMS (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have a safe new year

The real world might be safer than here, me thinks - cheers JarrahTree 06:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wuhan textile university

This is not a ad, please help me to create "wuhan textile university", thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zjjuseyy (talkcontribs) 08:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:12:43, 30 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by NemackiKutak


Hi Matthew,

I'm writing you since you are the reviewer of the articles I wrote. I'm not sure if I understand your feedback completely. What should I change to comply with policies? The Wikipedia page about Why But Why blog ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wait_But_Why ) was used as a reference.

Thanks for your time & feedback.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

NemackiKutak (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you reviewed Novorossia TV, but you didn't correct the mistake. Donetsk is not Russian city if you notice.--Beta Lohman (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AVS Video Converter

Hello, MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AVS Video Converter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sukuma calendar and Draft:Sukuma calendar (2)

Dear MatthewVanitas,

I agree, there could be issues to resolve before resubmitting the draft. There could be many more sources coming about the Sukuma calendar, I agree too. I think, we should still improve the article as time goes. I am reviewing the draft still but would also appreciate some help.

Thank you (Nghwaya (talk) 13:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Draft:Sukuma calendar (2) Commenting out some graphics

Dear MatthewVanitas,

I have gone half way to comment out the grapjics. I can't be sure if this is the real reason for the demanded improvement. I'll be ready to improve or remove the graphics completely. Just say a word. I don't want to waste more time.

Thank you (Nghwaya (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Review

Hi Matthew,

Thank you reviewing the page I created, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Murdoch The sources I used for references are official newspapers, as far I can tell correctly cited via the template. I don't understand why people keep placing the banner that de sources are unclear, they are not. Is there something else I should do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zonneroos (talkcontribs) 14:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]