User talk:Nghwaya

Archives

no archives yet (create)

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Nghwaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some tips that you might find helpful:

Link to other articles with [[double square brackets]]
- Here are some articles where you can practice adding links to other articles. When you've got at least two blue links in the article you can remove the code {{Dead end|date=Month year}} from near the top of the page.
Add pictures from Wikimedia Commons using [[double square brackets with|thumb for thumbnail|Left, right or center so it knows where to go|a meaningful caption|alt=a description for blind people]]
- Example [[Image:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg|thumb|right|Wiki biscuits are guaranteed zero calories! ]]
- Click here for an exercise in adding images to articles.
Add headings with ==double equal signs==
- If an article has sections two editors can edit different sections simultaneously without edit conflicts. Add enough sections and you get a contents section.
- Here are articles where you can practice adding sections when you've finished splitting an article into sections you can remove the code {{sections|date=Month year}} from the top of the page.
  - ===subheadings are similar===
When you add information to Wikipedia please precis things in your own words, and tell us where you got the information from in the following format <ref>[The webpage, book or magazine you are citing, a description, the word "retrieved" and today's date]</ref>
If you find unreferenced information on Wikipedia that you consider dubious or unlikely, first try to reference it with a search on the internet. If you know it is wrong correct it, if you can't find a source then {{fact}} adds the famous [citation needed]. If after a week no-one has referenced the information, feel free to remove it.
''Double single quotes'' gives you Italic and '''triple quotes'' Bold.

Many Wikipedians organise themselves by subject area, we have hundreds of WikiProjects ranging from Arts to Zoology, and I'm sure there will be ones that fit your interests. A good place to look for them is Category:WikiProjects_by_area, alternatively look at the talkpages of articles you are interested in and see which Wikiprojects have placed templates there.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit The Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ϣere SpielChequers 20:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easter Algorithm (1940) (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Computus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Easter Algorithm (1940) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 20:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nghwaya, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 20:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easter Calendar New Year (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Computus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Easter Calendar New Year and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enhancements of the Easter Algorithm (1940) (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Computus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enhancements of the Easter Algorithm (1940) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uganda Calendar

The article Uganda Calendar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's unclear what this article is supposed to be. It appears to be specifications from a Request For Proposal to "customize" the Gregorian calendar, or an application displaying the Gregorian calendar, for use in Uganda, whatever that "customization" means for that purpose. In any event, this is not a Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanzania Calendar

The article Tanzania Calendar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's unclear what this article is supposed to be. It appears to be specifications from a Request For Proposal to "customize" the Gregorian calendar, or an application displaying the Gregorian calendar, for use in Tanzania, whatever that "customization" means for that purpose. In any event, this is not a Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sukuma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Nghwaya. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology.The discussion is about the topic Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sukuma Calendar

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sukuma Calendar, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sukuma Ancient Milk Technology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sukuma Ancient Milk Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukuma Ancient Milk Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did with the article Sukuma Ancient Milk Technology. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 19:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing Previous Work

While an article is at AfD, please do not remove material. The articles you made currently have nothing, so editors have to check the edit history to actually read the articles, and it just creates extra work.ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 13:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sukuma calendar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sukuma calendar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukuma calendar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:VUgandaGregCalL2.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VUgandaGregCalL2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sukuma Calendar

Draft:Sukuma Calendar, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukuma Calendar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sukuma Calendar during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukuma calendar (2) (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Sukuma calendar, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukuma calendar (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-posting deleted content

Please do not repost content that was previously deleted on Wikipedia, which in this case was a draft article (Draft:Sukuma calendar) that was deleted at MfD. Reposting the content over and over again is not an option in this situation, especially as there were concerns that the content might be a hoax. Whether it is a hoax or just a non-notable topic is not really the point - the point is that you are reposting this content after an MfD and after it was already deleted at least once as a recreation of a deleted topic. You've re-created this several times (at least three), something that can be seen as being very disruptive on Wikipedia. This is already up for discussion at deletion review. Recreating it before you have the go ahead via DRV will only be seen as further disruption and can actually lead to you getting blocked from editing on Wikipedia.

As it is, I'm debating giving you at least a short block considering that you've done this several times in the mainspace so you should already be very aware that repeatedly trying to restore an article after a deletion discussion is not acceptable behavior. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at your contributions on Wikipedia and honestly, it looks like from the start you've been trying to add content to Wikipedia that is at best fringe material that would not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and at worst is a hoax or something you came up with yourself. You've tried to add some of this material to Wikipedia repeatedly, despite clear indications that it did not meet guidelines on Wikipedia and that reposting the content was seen as inappropriate. I have to assume that you will only continue this behavior if left unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you are ever unblocked, one requirement of the unblock would be that you could not re-create any of the material that you have previously written about on Wikipedia - and you would also have to go through WP:ADVENTURE or WP:TRAINING and show that you understand Wikipedia's WP:RS guidelines. We need to know that you understand what is and isn't a reliable source on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Easter Algorithm (1940)

Hello, Nghwaya. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Easter Algorithm".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Easter Calendar New Year

Hello, Nghwaya. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Easter Calendar New Year".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Enhancements of the Easter Algorithm (1940)

Hello, Nghwaya. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Enhancements of the Easter Algorithm".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]