Talk:Ctenosaura similis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Lisapaloma (talk | contribs) Disputing claim that hunting this species is not problematic. |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Corrected conversion assuming 21.7 mph was correct. I saw another reference that quoted 21.5 mph as the top speed. [[User:Dger|DGERobertson]] ([[User talk:Dger|talk]]) 20:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC) |
:Corrected conversion assuming 21.7 mph was correct. I saw another reference that quoted 21.5 mph as the top speed. [[User:Dger|DGERobertson]] ([[User talk:Dger|talk]]) 20:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Claim that ″Although it is heavily hunted it does not appear to be endangered in any of its native territory.″ is unfounded == |
|||
Disclaimer: Please excuse my lack of expertise in editing. Most of my previous edits have been for grammar or clarity, so I will not make the change to the actual page. |
|||
This claim is undocumented and unfounded. Please refer to <ref>ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/nonfao/lead/x6197e/x6197e02b.pdf</ref> for information about sustainability of hunting this species.[[User:Lisapaloma|Lisapaloma]] ([[User talk:Lisapaloma|talk]]) 04:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:06, 5 January 2017
Amphibians and Reptiles B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Ctenosaura similis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,929 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Central America B‑class | |||||||
|
Speed of 21.7 mph sounds like a conversion from metric raw data
If you convert 10 m/s or 35 km/h, you get 21.7 mph. Have we been demetricated? Lightmouse (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just quoting the source directly. Although I am in favor of demetrification!--Mike Searson (talk) 08:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Corrected conversion assuming 21.7 mph was correct. I saw another reference that quoted 21.5 mph as the top speed. DGERobertson (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Claim that ″Although it is heavily hunted it does not appear to be endangered in any of its native territory.″ is unfounded
Disclaimer: Please excuse my lack of expertise in editing. Most of my previous edits have been for grammar or clarity, so I will not make the change to the actual page.
This claim is undocumented and unfounded. Please refer to [1] for information about sustainability of hunting this species.Lisapaloma (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)