Jump to content

Talk:List of music software: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 33: Line 33:
=== "Some" cleanup? You did a LOT of work, thank you! ===
=== "Some" cleanup? You did a LOT of work, thank you! ===


[[User:Pdecalculus|Pdecalculus]] ([[User talk:Pdecalculus|talk]]) 23:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
~~

Revision as of 23:11, 26 January 2017

Thank You to Voidxor

I put in for a peer review and Voidxor was kind enough to extensively review, edit and clean this article to wiki standards, citing many details along the way. Thanks for doing more than criticize, in the form of real, extensive, detailed work! I've got to pick out a new badge for you.Pdecalculus (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MetaSynth

No mention of MetaSynth? http://www.uisoftware.com/MetaSynth/index.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.147.85 (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atari ST Music Software

Hello this is suggestion for Atari ST and Commodore Amiga Music Software. I think this software started same time late 80th when Steinberg start. My suggestion is Dr. T’s KCS Keyboard Controlled Sequencer for Amiga and Atari ST. It works with Pattern. In the opposite Steinberg works like a band machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.220.152.242 (talk) 15:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogen

I don't know where Hydrogen Drum Machine (http://www.hydrogen-music.org/hcms/) might best go, but I just wanted to point out here that it exists in case someone would like to add it. Bujiraso (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did some cleanup

A reminder that Wikipedia is not a software directory and should almost never attempt to have exhaustive lists of examples of software. The standard for inclusion in lists like this is for each piece of software that's included to have its own Wikipedia article. In some cases, local consensus can determine that items can be added if supported by sufficient reliable secondary sources such that they could have their own article per WP:GNG. Also, there should be no external links in the body of the article -- only in the references and/or external links (and all need to conform to WP:EL). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Some" cleanup? You did a LOT of work, thank you!

Pdecalculus (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]