Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup

Editing required for Statistics (Assists) and Awards (Silver Boot)

Upon speculation, I found that Thomas Müller's total number of assists under Statistics is 2, and under the Silver Boot information (under Awards), it is 3. However, neither of these values are correct; Müller, in fact, assisted in 4 goals. I was going to fix this minor error but was not permitted to do so. This should be fixed to prevent any confusion. Thank you.

Soccerbot01 (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Soccerbot01

Merger Discussion

Request received to merge List of 2014 FIFA World Cup matches into FIFA World Cup; date=November 26, 2015; discuss here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 05:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: Isn't there a set precedent/layout for these types of articles from prior years? GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"}
• Delete: It's a redundant list, as all the matches are listed already in the main article. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 09:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

140k!

This article is 140k in size, and long as well. This article should be split apart. There's no reason for all this to reside on a single page.

Why are the group stage individual results duplicated here?

Why are the are the knockout stage detailed results duplicated here?

Why not move all the match/stage summaries off onto a separate subarticle, and only list the Final and final rankings here instead?

-- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I strongly oppose this suggestion!! A tournament like World Cup needs detailed discussion so size of the article shouldn't lead to truncated information!! It has already been shortened earlier and the exact format has been followed per the pages of earlier World Cup editions!!! We can't keep on changing all the pages of past World Cups!!! I think it's absolutely fine as it is now!!! Cricket246 (talk) 16:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Why do we have match summaries here? We only need the round results tables and knockout round tree. We don't need game breakdowns, since that replicates information found in the sub-articles that already exist. We should keep in mind readability for people who need to use screenreaders; and accessibility for people on mobile devices, neither of whch is helped by large pages or long pages. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

I myself am active in Wikipedia via a mobile phone with slow net connections and I never had any problems with this format... So I still oppose your discussed move because the article's alright as it is now!!! Cricket246 (talk) 12:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:SIZE/WP:TOOBIG the recommendation is to split it up -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually WP:SIZE/WP:TOOBIG talk about readable prose, not wikitext. Currently the readable prose (as measured by User:Dr pda/prosesize) is 23kb, which is well within limit. Rami R 14:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Claude Biskoppen

Claude var en biskop der reagerede tronen i de gode gamle dage. Han var en dansk Biskop som skulle vokse op til at blive en Pave. Idag sidder han på tronen, nede i thibetanien. Med sin trofaste hjælper Otterbanjomis. Som også er igang med at udvikle sig til en Banjotiger.<img src="https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-prn/t51.2885-19/929190_280056082200364_2013514701_a.jpg" alt="Billedresultat for claude nielsen"/>