Talk:Slade Green: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:44, 5 February 2017

UK geography Start‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Start‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Looking Good!

This is a great effort for a first article! Kukini 15:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Four Pubs?

There's the sports pub on the A206, the Lord Raglan, and the Corner Pin. What's the fourth - is there another one along the A206 that i've forgotten?

Depends what you count as Slade Green I guess - maybe the original article was including the Railway Tavern which has now closed, and I haven't changed this as I've been counting the pub on Boundary Street, but maybe that's more Erith than Slade Green, although in North End ward. Sladegreenforum 13:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2 pubs & 2 clubs

There are only 2 pubs now in Slade Green. The Lord Raglan & The Corner Pin. The football club & railway club also sell alcohol but these are members only clubs. The pubs that one were along Northend road have now gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.253.230 (talk) 10:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

County

@86.173.103.127. I have deleted your entire sub section about a so-called local dispute about addresses. It is a barely disguised personal agenda not based on good references. You do give two citations, one, Hansard, is obviously good, but it isn't about Slade Green or about London-Kent, not even indirectly. The other one is not a good source. I have kept the Hansard citation because it is good in the right place, so I have put it in the Pembrokeshire article. It would also fit well in the Royal Mail article. Please try to get familiar with some basic WP principles and rules before putting in such poorly referenced personal opinion. If this issue of 'counties' was as simple as your input makes out, there would not be such contradiction and confusion throughout society and in hundreds of WP articles. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Roger 8 Rover. Parliament is the place for discussing UK-wide issues, and Pembrokeshire is the example that Parliament used on one occasion. The evidence that MPs debated is equally applicable to all UK regions affected by border changes. You can't say that UK-decisions about criminal acts occurring in Pembrokeshire do not apply outside Pembrokeshire, so why make any equally absurd distinction about debates in Parliament? It is narrow and subjective selection criteria that creates the contradictions and confusions in society, and deleting evidence is not clearing dispute. If you are so good at research why do you not clarify instead of delete?

Revision as of 11:43, 5 February 2017 edit 86.173.103.127 (talk) →‎County ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:44, 5 February 2017 edit undo 86.173.103.127 (talk) →‎County Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	@86.173.103.127. I have deleted your entire sub section about a so-called local dispute about addresses. It is a barely disguised personal agenda not based on good references. You do give two citations, one, Hansard, is obviously good, but it isn't about Slade Green or about London-Kent, not even indirectly. The other one is not a good source. I have kept the Hansard citation because it is good in the right place, so I have put it in the Pembrokeshire article. It would also fit well in the Royal Mail article. Please try to get familiar with some basic WP principles and rules before putting in such poorly referenced personal opinion. If this issue of 'counties' was as simple as your input makes out, there would not be such contradiction and confusion throughout society and in hundreds of WP articles. [[User:Roger 8 Roger\|Roger 8 Roger]] ([[User talk:Roger 8 Roger\|talk]]) 05:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		@86.173.103.127. I have deleted your entire sub section about a so-called local dispute about addresses. It is a barely disguised personal agenda not based on good references. You do give two citations, one, Hansard, is obviously good, but it isn't about Slade Green or about London-Kent, not even indirectly. The other one is not a good source. I have kept the Hansard citation because it is good in the right place, so I have put it in the Pembrokeshire article. It would also fit well in the Royal Mail article. Please try to get familiar with some basic WP principles and rules before putting in such poorly referenced personal opinion. If this issue of 'counties' was as simple as your input makes out, there would not be such contradiction and confusion throughout society and in hundreds of WP articles. [[User:Roger 8 Roger\|Roger 8 Roger]] ([[User talk:Roger 8 Roger\|talk]]) 05:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

	@Roger 8 Rover. Parliament is the place for discussing UK-wide issues, and Pembrokeshire is the example that Parliament used on one occasion. The evidence that MPs debated is equally applicable to all UK regions affected by border changes. You can't say that a UK-~~wide~~ decisions about criminal acts occurring in Pembrokeshire do not apply outside Pembrokeshire, so why make any equally absurd distinction about debates in Parliament? It is narrow and subjective selection criteria that creates the contradictions and confusions in society, and deleting evidence is not clearing dispute. If you are so good at research why do you not clarify instead of delete?		@Roger 8 Rover. Parliament is the place for discussing UK-wide issues, and Pembrokeshire is the example that Parliament used on one occasion. The evidence that MPs debated is equally applicable to all UK regions affected by border changes. You can't say that UK-decisions about criminal acts occurring in Pembrokeshire do not apply outside Pembrokeshire, so why make any equally absurd distinction about debates in Parliament? It is narrow and subjective selection criteria that creates the contradictions and confusions in society, and deleting evidence is not clearing dispute. If you are so good at research why do you not clarify instead of delete?