Talk:Oroville Dam crisis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Suggested References== |
== Suggested References== |
||
Anyone want another reference [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/13/lake-oroville-dam-california-emergency-repairs-evacuation The Guardian UK ] --[[User:ClemRutter|ClemRutter]] ([[User talk:ClemRutter|talk]]) 20:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
Anyone want another reference [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/13/lake-oroville-dam-california-emergency-repairs-evacuation The Guardian UK ] --[[User:ClemRutter|ClemRutter]] ([[User talk:ClemRutter|talk]]) 20:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
= River Bypass = |
|||
There was also a river bypass that the dam was built with. It was damaged extensively in 2009 and has never been used since. |
|||
Not sure if this should be added, but in researching any catastrophe, all significant factors should be disclosed. |
|||
Revision as of 04:49, 14 February 2017
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oroville Dam crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Suggested References
Anyone want another reference The Guardian UK --ClemRutter (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
River Bypass
There was also a river bypass that the dam was built with. It was damaged extensively in 2009 and has never been used since.
Not sure if this should be added, but in researching any catastrophe, all significant factors should be disclosed.