Jump to content

User talk:Jennica: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Jennica/Archive 3) (bot
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Bot: Notice of potential reference breaking
Line 64: Line 64:
:::I don't know any about your past SPI case, I'm more concerned with this case which is not out of bounds. While not prohibited, constantly checking user's history logs is discouraged against, as per [[WP:HOUNDING]] (the second paragraph). As with many users I have come across in the past, I do intend to work together despite the disruptive behavior. Although I do not have any problems going the Administrative Desk to reach a consensus should this behavior continues. It was strange how you took an interest in those pages only after I began editing them, and no I am not ownership. [[User:Horizonlove|Horizonlove]] ([[User talk:Horizonlove|talk]]) 03:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
:::I don't know any about your past SPI case, I'm more concerned with this case which is not out of bounds. While not prohibited, constantly checking user's history logs is discouraged against, as per [[WP:HOUNDING]] (the second paragraph). As with many users I have come across in the past, I do intend to work together despite the disruptive behavior. Although I do not have any problems going the Administrative Desk to reach a consensus should this behavior continues. It was strange how you took an interest in those pages only after I began editing them, and no I am not ownership. [[User:Horizonlove|Horizonlove]] ([[User talk:Horizonlove|talk]]) 03:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Horizonlove}} I assumed when you said it was my third violation, you were talking about my SPI case. I already explained after I saw your songwriting inclusion on one page, I checked through a couple of other pages and saw they were included. I don't like the accusation. I don't feel like checking 3 past edits constitutes being accused for hounding. However, I am not looking to check your history again since I don't want another one of these petty confrontations. I've said to another person before so I'll say to you: wikipedia and its editor's histories are public domain. If you feel like I am hounding you after looking at 3 other pages you've edited on, that's you getting bothered by it. You've only asked me to stop once, so I didn't even know or aware that you felt like I was hounding you.. then ''boom'' all of a sudden I am "in violation of hounding" you three times. I am not! I don't like bad blood with any wikipedia editor. Any future edits that you've edited on that I edit on will be purely coincidental. I don't want to be involved in this kind of thing. I can say that I've only checked your history about twice.. which doesn't translate into 'constantly'. --[[User:Jennica|<span style="font-weight:bold;font-variant:small-caps;color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#F49259;letter-spacing:1pt;">Jennica</span>]]<span style="background-color:#B4DF6F">✿</span> / <sup>[[User_talk:Jennica| talk]]</sup> 03:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Horizonlove}} I assumed when you said it was my third violation, you were talking about my SPI case. I already explained after I saw your songwriting inclusion on one page, I checked through a couple of other pages and saw they were included. I don't like the accusation. I don't feel like checking 3 past edits constitutes being accused for hounding. However, I am not looking to check your history again since I don't want another one of these petty confrontations. I've said to another person before so I'll say to you: wikipedia and its editor's histories are public domain. If you feel like I am hounding you after looking at 3 other pages you've edited on, that's you getting bothered by it. You've only asked me to stop once, so I didn't even know or aware that you felt like I was hounding you.. then ''boom'' all of a sudden I am "in violation of hounding" you three times. I am not! I don't like bad blood with any wikipedia editor. Any future edits that you've edited on that I edit on will be purely coincidental. I don't want to be involved in this kind of thing. I can say that I've only checked your history about twice.. which doesn't translate into 'constantly'. --[[User:Jennica|<span style="font-weight:bold;font-variant:small-caps;color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#F49259;letter-spacing:1pt;">Jennica</span>]]<span style="background-color:#B4DF6F">✿</span> / <sup>[[User_talk:Jennica| talk]]</sup> 03:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
== Reference errors on 18 February ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
*On the [[:Petit Biscuit (EP)]] page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=766114341 your edit] caused a [[:Category:Pages_with_incorrect_ref_formatting|cite error]] <small>([[Help:Cite errors|help]])</small>. ([{{fullurl:Petit Biscuit (EP)|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F766114341%7C{{Replace|Petit Biscuit (EP)| |%20}}%5D%5D Ask for help])
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->[[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]] ([[User talk:ReferenceBot|talk]]) 00:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:24, 19 February 2017


Season's greetings!

Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Genres for Run Up

Hello User:Jennica, can you cite this source on Run Up song page for it's genre(s) please, [1] here it's called dancehall and described as having "island-inspired beats", "rap verses", a "dancehall hook", "deep bass undertones" and a "light, tropical synth topline". Appreciated if you can, thanks. There's other sites that list genres for this song also.--2A02:C7D:892B:3D00:3DB6:6BB8:AB17:9E87 (talk) 06:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help by adding a personal section for this article, like you did in the Starboy article earlier. The source for the liner notes is find here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAmazingPeanuts: - I am not really up for it at the moment to be honest. Sorry --Jennica / talk 03:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul

Hi Jennica

I have no idea why my page was deleted ( Paul Moran Musician )

He is a high profile musician - and I listed a lot of the people he has played with. Is this why you deleted the article

This is my first attempt at this - and I did e mail to ask what was the problem. If you would be kind enough to point me in the right direction I need to put the page up again

Any help appreciated

Thanks

John Williams

Webjectives — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webjectives (talkcontribs) 18:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bare references

Thanks you for filling out my ferences. I was a bit lazy when I made it.★Trekker (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikihounding

Wikihounding is the singling out of one or more editors, and joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance or distress to the other editor. Wikihounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia. You fit this criteria as joined a discussion [2] as well as repeatedly confront my work on these pages: [3], [4], [5]. I would ask that you discontinue being disruptive and behave like an adult, especially when commenting with childish emojis. Horizonlove (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Horizonlove: I don't really wish to discuss this since I didn't do anything wrong. I checked your edits after I saw you are apparently obsessed with listing songwriters in Personnel sections. Checking past history twice or even three times isn't considered hounding. I don't really care to discuss this further. You're going a bit overboard I think. If I was checking up on your edits everyday, then you can get on my case, but I certainly don't care to. You're seemingly more concerned about my past than I am with yours. "Feedback has been universal that this is not a case of WP:HOUNDING." - my past SPI case. you are definitely out of bounds with this "accusation". --Jennica / talk 03:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know any about your past SPI case, I'm more concerned with this case which is not out of bounds. While not prohibited, constantly checking user's history logs is discouraged against, as per WP:HOUNDING (the second paragraph). As with many users I have come across in the past, I do intend to work together despite the disruptive behavior. Although I do not have any problems going the Administrative Desk to reach a consensus should this behavior continues. It was strange how you took an interest in those pages only after I began editing them, and no I am not ownership. Horizonlove (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Horizonlove: I assumed when you said it was my third violation, you were talking about my SPI case. I already explained after I saw your songwriting inclusion on one page, I checked through a couple of other pages and saw they were included. I don't like the accusation. I don't feel like checking 3 past edits constitutes being accused for hounding. However, I am not looking to check your history again since I don't want another one of these petty confrontations. I've said to another person before so I'll say to you: wikipedia and its editor's histories are public domain. If you feel like I am hounding you after looking at 3 other pages you've edited on, that's you getting bothered by it. You've only asked me to stop once, so I didn't even know or aware that you felt like I was hounding you.. then boom all of a sudden I am "in violation of hounding" you three times. I am not! I don't like bad blood with any wikipedia editor. Any future edits that you've edited on that I edit on will be purely coincidental. I don't want to be involved in this kind of thing. I can say that I've only checked your history about twice.. which doesn't translate into 'constantly'. --Jennica / talk 03:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]