Jump to content

User talk:Ivasykus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DPL bot (talk | contribs)
dablink notification message (see the FAQ)
No edit summary
Line 61: Line 61:


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

== Proposed deletion of [[Standalone film]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]

The article [[Standalone film]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern:
:'''This is a [[WP:DICDEF|dictionary definition]], and a poorly written one that [[WP:SYNTH|synthesizes]] derived terms that are not actually in the sources (which themselves don't define the term at art, just use two common words together).'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Standalone film|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->


You were rudely not notified by {{User|Oknazevad}} of this proposed deletion, so here's the PROD for you to check it out. [[Special:Contributions/82.26.59.181|82.26.59.181]] ([[User talk:82.26.59.181|talk]]) 08:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:51, 20 March 2017

Welcome

Hello Ivasykus, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ivasykus, good luck, and have fun. --Shinerunner (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deception Point

Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with these edits to Deception Point, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. There is no such edition mentioned at the source you cited. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 08:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re this edit; please note that per WP:WDATA, all interlanguage links are now stored in Wikidata - see d:Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/An Adventure in Space and Time. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The city of the heroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Hug (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Standalone film

The article Standalone film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a dictionary definition, and a poorly written one that synthesizes derived terms that are not actually in the sources (which themselves don't define the term at art, just use two common words together).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.


You were rudely not notified by Oknazevad (talk · contribs) of this proposed deletion, so here's the PROD for you to check it out. 82.26.59.181 (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]