Jump to content

User talk:Dane: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Your Message: new section
Line 67: Line 67:
The Kevin Borich updates where minor and included adding link tags to relevant articles in relation to his history. How can you deny that ?? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Darrel3241|Darrel3241]] ([[User talk:Darrel3241#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Darrel3241|contribs]]) 02:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The Kevin Borich updates where minor and included adding link tags to relevant articles in relation to his history. How can you deny that ?? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Darrel3241|Darrel3241]] ([[User talk:Darrel3241#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Darrel3241|contribs]]) 02:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{ping|Darrel3241}} The post above was not about you or claiming you were "KO_A". That was unrelated. In terms of your edits, you need to cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which it sounds like you understand now. Just ensure you're not using references with your username listed as the reference. Thanks. -- <b>[[User:Dane|<span style="color:blue">Dane</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Dane|<font color="#00AC1D">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> </b> 02:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Darrel3241}} The post above was not about you or claiming you were "KO_A". That was unrelated. In terms of your edits, you need to cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which it sounds like you understand now. Just ensure you're not using references with your username listed as the reference. Thanks. -- <b>[[User:Dane|<span style="color:blue">Dane</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Dane|<font color="#00AC1D">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> </b> 02:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Your Message ==

Hi Dane!

I just wanted to clarify -- to the page: Polarization (Electrochemistry), I solely made grammatical edits such as adding spaces between punctuation marks and the next word or capitalizing new sentences. Unfortunately, something got slightly messed up with my edits, and a strange type of format was introduced, changing the layout (ie. had courier new font and a different indent pattern). To remedy this, I copied the text into my clipboard, deleted the text from the wiki page and saved the page. I then went it and re-edited the page to add the text back and saved the page. There should have been no difference, except that the format was back to what was expected. If you could restore my grammatical fix-ups, I would greatly appreciate it! Thanks for your heads-up, and I will remember to add a summary next time!

Thanks,

User

Revision as of 02:43, 31 March 2017

unwarranted variation

Dear Dane need help here as I am new to wiki. I have been asked to suspend my additions to this entry temporarily by Gov agency until they clear content. how do I do this? should be for about 2 weeks Lauraserrant (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)lauraLauraserrant (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lauraserrant: Please read our conflict of interest policy for more guidance on this. We maintain well sourced items. Thanks. -- Dane talk 17:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lauraserrant (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)I'm still confused by the language of the policy page. not really sure it answers my question?Lauraserrant (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving "generalized pustular psoriasis" to "pustular psoriasis"

Looking at it now, It's going to be easier to just create a new page for pustular psoriasis–instead of moving the "generalized pustular psoriasis" to "pustular psoriasis" page and editing accordingly. Can I withdraw my request to move the page? IIIBALESIII 19:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

@Iiibalesiii: Done. Request retracted and removed. Thanks! -- Dane talk 20:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dane, when clicking on the disambiguation pages Deep Trouble (disambiguation) and Double Trouble (disambiguation) is says Redirected from, if the page was named disambiguation, it wouldn't do that, I tried to rename these pages disambiguation, but was unable to, do you know how to do that so it will say disambiguation page? Also on the page of List of people who disappeared mysteriously there are 23 dead links, is there a was to format the links into references so that they can't be clicked on anymore, but they look well formatted? I tried to do the first one myself but did not do a very good job of it.

@Davidgoodheart: Hi David. Sorry I missed this post. Not exactly sure what you're asking in regards to this. The redirected from message appears when a page has been moved with a redirect left behind. -- Dane talk 01:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Party Boys edits

Hello Dane,

I am wondering why you reverted the edits of fact that I have added to The Party Boys? Darrel Baird 01:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrel3241 (talkcontribs)

@Darrel3241: Your edits used a reference only including your username and not following the reliable sourcing policy. If you use reliable sources, you can reinstate your edits. -- Dane talk 01:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty Positive........

Pretty positive This is our old friend Clash. Not sure how to add to archived investigation. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WarMachineWildThing: I'm sure you're correct. Opening the SPI now. -- Dane talk 01:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@WarMachineWildThing: Added a new report to the SPI. -- Dane talk 01:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
After doing some looking at Contributions, that may actually be the master, same edit habits, same name style, but here longer than Clash. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Not........

Gee whizz guys, I do not have other accounts with Wikipedia nor have I ever. And I am only attempting to add relevant and honest information. and I am certainly not KO_A

I did make one error when attempting to update information on Stuart O'Grady's living person details and will enter into talk about this soon. Everything in The Party Boys and Kevin Borich is relevant and factual and I will now attempt to find reliable source to prove all that is written. The correct account of Paul Christies version of The Party Boys is missing some factual points and needs to be corrected slightly to better show the true line of the bands history.

The Kevin Borich updates where minor and included adding link tags to relevant articles in relation to his history. How can you deny that ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrel3241 (talkcontribs) 02:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Darrel3241: The post above was not about you or claiming you were "KO_A". That was unrelated. In terms of your edits, you need to cite reliable sources which it sounds like you understand now. Just ensure you're not using references with your username listed as the reference. Thanks. -- Dane talk 02:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Message

Hi Dane!

I just wanted to clarify -- to the page: Polarization (Electrochemistry), I solely made grammatical edits such as adding spaces between punctuation marks and the next word or capitalizing new sentences. Unfortunately, something got slightly messed up with my edits, and a strange type of format was introduced, changing the layout (ie. had courier new font and a different indent pattern). To remedy this, I copied the text into my clipboard, deleted the text from the wiki page and saved the page. I then went it and re-edited the page to add the text back and saved the page. There should have been no difference, except that the format was back to what was expected. If you could restore my grammatical fix-ups, I would greatly appreciate it! Thanks for your heads-up, and I will remember to add a summary next time!

Thanks,

User