Talk:Test double: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Test Double to Talk:Test double: Even says explicitly it's a generic term |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure of the policies for removing templates such as "lead too short." I left it in place, but I hope my changes will allow it to be removed. |
I'm not sure of the policies for removing templates such as "lead too short." I left it in place, but I hope my changes will allow it to be removed. |
||
==Merge to test double== |
|||
Most of the article (including the whole incipit) is really about [[test double]]s and not mocks. Much of the content in fact duplicates [[test double]], including the discussion of the terminology issues around the misuse of the word "mock" as a pseudonym for "test double". Note that there are specific arguments (cited both in the article and in cited resourced) to ''not'' use the work "mock" as a pseudonym for "test double", when speaking formally (as should be the case here). |
|||
[[User:Moongateclimber|Moongateclimber]] ([[User talk:Moongateclimber|talk]]) 20:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:15, 22 April 2017
I'm not sure of the policies for removing templates such as "lead too short." I left it in place, but I hope my changes will allow it to be removed.
Merge to test double
Most of the article (including the whole incipit) is really about test doubles and not mocks. Much of the content in fact duplicates test double, including the discussion of the terminology issues around the misuse of the word "mock" as a pseudonym for "test double". Note that there are specific arguments (cited both in the article and in cited resourced) to not use the work "mock" as a pseudonym for "test double", when speaking formally (as should be the case here). Moongateclimber (talk) 20:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)