Talk:Echoes (Pink Floyd song): Difference between revisions
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:{{ping|Mlpearc}}Thank you for replying. I'm sorry but I don't see how my edit does not meet the criteria in [[WP:NSONG]] and [[WP:COVERSONG]]. It states: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." The cover definitely meets that criteria. |
:{{ping|Mlpearc}}Thank you for replying. I'm sorry but I don't see how my edit does not meet the criteria in [[WP:NSONG]] and [[WP:COVERSONG]]. It states: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." The cover definitely meets that criteria. |
||
:{{ping|Mlpearc}}I'm not trying to be hostile, I'm just trying to learn. More information would be helpful. Thanks. [[User:WisemanOnceSaid|WisemanOnceSaid]] ([[User talk:WisemanOnceSaid|talk]]) 16:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Mlpearc}}I'm not trying to be hostile, I'm just trying to learn. More information would be helpful. Thanks. [[User:WisemanOnceSaid|WisemanOnceSaid]] ([[User talk:WisemanOnceSaid|talk]]) 16:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Mlpearc}} I can't seem to reply to you on your talk page so I will reply here. I still think my edit meets the criteria you referred to in a previous comment. Can't we get another editor in here to peer review the edits I am proposing? [[User:WisemanOnceSaid|WisemanOnceSaid]] ([[User talk:WisemanOnceSaid|talk]]) 17:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:55, 24 April 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Echoes (Pink Floyd song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Echoes (Pink Floyd song) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Pink Floyd B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Echoes (Pink Floyd song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Echoes Cover addition request
I recently made the mistake of making an addition this page without requesting it. I wanted to make an addition to the "cover versions" section to include a cover which has been doing the rounds on the internet. A YouTuber/musician who does many Floyd covers did a full cover of this song. My original edit was removed because the cover wasn't "notable". I'd like to know what makes a cover notable. This particular cover was shared by many blogs and websites and people non other than Pink Floyd drummer himself Nick Mason, receiving high praise from the main man.
I think for a Wikipedia page this detailed it should also include more covers. It looks a bit empty the way it is just now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WisemanOnceSaid (talk • contribs) 23:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- @WisemanOnceSaid: Thank you for starting a discussion, I have to oppose per WP:NSONG and WP:COVERSONG. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Mlpearc:Thank you for replying. I'm sorry but I don't see how my edit does not meet the criteria in WP:NSONG and WP:COVERSONG. It states: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." The cover definitely meets that criteria.
- @Mlpearc:I'm not trying to be hostile, I'm just trying to learn. More information would be helpful. Thanks. WisemanOnceSaid (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Mlpearc: I can't seem to reply to you on your talk page so I will reply here. I still think my edit meets the criteria you referred to in a previous comment. Can't we get another editor in here to peer review the edits I am proposing? WisemanOnceSaid (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)