Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Peluffo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


This page is about the former ''Deputy'' Mayor (not even the Mayor) of a town with a population of 2,000. I think that qualifies for a deletion. [[User:Gamesmasterg9|Gamesmaster G-9]] ([[User talk:Gamesmasterg9|talk]]) 09:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
This page is about the former ''Deputy'' Mayor (not even the Mayor) of a town with a population of 2,000. I think that qualifies for a deletion. [[User:Gamesmasterg9|Gamesmaster G-9]] ([[User talk:Gamesmasterg9|talk]]) 09:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

'''Delete.''' Does not meet the notability criteria, neither as a local politician, nor as an academician (the page of the mentioned academic society is itself proposed for deletion). [[Special:Contributions/86.120.254.110|86.120.254.110]] ([[User talk:86.120.254.110|talk]]) 00:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:01, 5 May 2017

Alberto Peluffo

Alberto Peluffo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a CSD A7 as being a deputy mayor seems to clear the criteria and there are sources, which was then reverted with the summary "see talk page". Since the talk page had nothing on it, I'm coming here instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the following on the talk page. You probably just missed it.

According to WP:POLOUTCOMES: "Municipal politicians are not inherently notable just for being in politics, but neither are they inherently non-notable just because they are in local politics. Each case is evaluated on its own individual merits. Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just "Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville". Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors, although they may be notable for other reasons in addition to their mayoralty (e.g. having previously held a more notable office). Note that this criterion has not generally been as restrictive as the criterion for city councillors. City councillors and other major municipal officers are not automatically notable, although precedent has tended to favor keeping members of the main citywide government of internationally famous metropolitan areas such as Toronto, Chicago, Tokyo, or London, or cities with populations of greater than 500,000. Losing candidates for municipal election are not considered inherently notable just for their candidacy and are generally deleted unless previous notability can be demonstrated."

This page is about the former Deputy Mayor (not even the Mayor) of a town with a population of 2,000. I think that qualifies for a deletion. Gamesmaster G-9 (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet the notability criteria, neither as a local politician, nor as an academician (the page of the mentioned academic society is itself proposed for deletion). 86.120.254.110 (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]