User talk:Somajeeste: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:22, 7 May 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Somajeeste, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Kndimov (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Your recent editing history at Hargeisa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

There is no need for edit warring here, you seem to be well aware of the Somaliland-Somalia issue. I have replaced the source with the BBC's profile of Somaliland because it is taking into account the reality of Somaliland's de facto status, this is very appropriate for the article and will save continues edit warring. Perhaps your efforts are better suited to populating and fixing the articles in the section rather than engaging in edit wars over Somaliland's status? You do risk getting your membership blocked if you continue. Any discussions on the matter are better suited to the talkpages rather than editwars. Kzl55 (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you are the one waging edit war don't remove valid content that represents the best data we have for Hargeisa, your edit removed a helpful external link. Wikipedia is built upon WP:REFERENCES and WP:NPOV - please do not remove links that potentially add information to the encyclopedia. don't remove useful content Somajeeste (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Somajeeste reported by User:Kzl55 (Result: ). Thank you. Kzl55 (talk) 16:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Adal_Sultanate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You are in violation of Wikipedia rules again. This is your second case of edit warring in the span of a day. Please cease the disruptive edits. Kzl55 (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well don't remove useful content which was added. I will refrain from replying to the rest of your comment. Somajeeste (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Somajeeste reported by User:Kzl55 (Result: ). Thank you. Kzl55 (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Please stop the edit warring and do not violate 3RR again—ordinarily, I would be blocking you, but I had already protected the page before the report was filed. El_C 16:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El_C They continue to edit war, ([1], [2]) despite your warning above. Would a block be justified now seeing as they should have already been blocked for violating 3RR despite ample warning? This would be in addition to clearly disruptive editing history as illustrated here. Kzl55 (talk) 11:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False, you are the one removing sourcing content simply because ' i don't like it' sorry body wikipedia doesn't work that way you are violating WP:NPOV and it is unacceptable look what he did yesterday

[3] 00:20, 1 May 2017
[4] 08:44, 1 May 2017
[5] 19:50, 1 May 2017‎

and again today [[6]] , [[7]] ,[[8]] and [[9]] i will keep reverting (the useful content) Please cease the disruptive edits.Somajeeste (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El_C he violated 3RR yesterday and again today he is doing same thing i reported him yesterday , since when it become normal to violate over and over again and get away with it ?[[10]]

3RR Warning

Your recent editing history at Bosaso shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please engage in the talkpage and stop the edit war. Kzl55 (talk) 12:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

Despite my warning you continue to edit war and not engage the article talk page. You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating the Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 09:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
 Please engage in the talkpage and stop the edit war. [[User:Kzl55|Kzl55]] ([[User talk:Kzl55|talk]]) 12:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
+==3RR block==
+Despite my warning you continue to edit war and not engage the article talk page. You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating the [[WP:3RR|Three revert rule]]. Please be more careful in the future. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 09:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)