Jump to content

User talk:Ivanalesi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ivanalesi (talk | contribs)
Line 62: Line 62:


::See [[WP:RS]] (and [[WP:CORP]]). Please consider using [[WP:AFC]] next time in order to reduce the risk of being deleted. (pls also login) <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 11:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
::See [[WP:RS]] (and [[WP:CORP]]). Please consider using [[WP:AFC]] next time in order to reduce the risk of being deleted. (pls also login) <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 11:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have worked as journalists for many years and even the journalists in the news departments don't consider Reuters etc. as more reliable than specialist websites.
I don't want to argue, but then most of the automotive and especially motorsport sections should be deleted because Reuters consider only F1, 24h Le Mans and Indy 500 as sports or they would never report on the new tuned Merc by Brabus.

Revision as of 12:10, 11 May 2017

Welcome

Hello, Ivanalesi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Brandon Maisano have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 22:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ivanalesi. You have new messages at Bobby122's talk page.
Message added 02:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A page you started (TopCar) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating TopCar, Ivanalesi!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work. Need one photograph.

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Payrexx

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Payrexx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution but it needs reliable sources.
No page links here.Xx236 (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ivanalesi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TopCar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TopCar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Widefox; talk 00:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 00:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article TopCar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG - sourcing is v weak not obvious WP:RS (no editorial control or stated publisher on website, just a website)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 12:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand. The sources are all reputable automotive websites, otherwise they wouldn't have 2mln Facebook followers! The company itself also has big social media following, all this information comes from these sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.231.141.32 (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:RS (and WP:CORP). Please consider using WP:AFC next time in order to reduce the risk of being deleted. (pls also login) Widefox; talk 11:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have worked as journalists for many years and even the journalists in the news departments don't consider Reuters etc. as more reliable than specialist websites. I don't want to argue, but then most of the automotive and especially motorsport sections should be deleted because Reuters consider only F1, 24h Le Mans and Indy 500 as sports or they would never report on the new tuned Merc by Brabus.