Jump to content

Talk:Nodosaurus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
replace Geology & Extinction banners with Palaeontology
→‎New fossil: new section
Line 11: Line 11:


Carpenter, K., D. Dilkes, and D. B. Weishampel. 1995. The dinosaurs of the Niobrara Chalk Formation (upper Cretaceous, Kansas), Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15(2): 275-297.[[User:Extrapolaris|Extrapolaris]] ([[User talk:Extrapolaris|talk]]) 14:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Carpenter, K., D. Dilkes, and D. B. Weishampel. 1995. The dinosaurs of the Niobrara Chalk Formation (upper Cretaceous, Kansas), Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15(2): 275-297.[[User:Extrapolaris|Extrapolaris]] ([[User talk:Extrapolaris|talk]]) 14:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian

== New fossil ==

http://nos.nl/artikel/2173338-alsof-hij-slaapt-uitzonderlijk-goed-bewaarde-dino-gevonden.html

Revision as of 11:28, 16 May 2017

WikiProject iconDinosaurs Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPalaeontology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm against calling the Linnean categorization by 'scientific classification'. This implies it is the accepted scientific norm. In fact, cladistics is becoming more and more prevalent, and that is what I would expect to see in a category of 'scientific classification'.

Hear, hear.--MWAK 10:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New page for Hierosaurus

With respect to Hierosaurus, this genus should be redirected to its own page because it was once considered a synonym of Nodosaurus but is now considered a nomen dubium as per Carpenter et al. (1995). In any case, Hierosaurus was found in deposits younger than the only specimen of Nodosaurus, and is clearly not Nodosaurus. As a matter of fact, the interrelationships of Middle and Late Cretaceous nodosaurids have yet to be addressed in future papers.

Carpenter, K., D. Dilkes, and D. B. Weishampel. 1995. The dinosaurs of the Niobrara Chalk Formation (upper Cretaceous, Kansas), Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15(2): 275-297.Extrapolaris (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

New fossil

http://nos.nl/artikel/2173338-alsof-hij-slaapt-uitzonderlijk-goed-bewaarde-dino-gevonden.html