Talk:Shell Shaker: Difference between revisions
→Sections to Delete or Substantially Trim: new section |
Lord Gherkin (talk | contribs) →Areas for improvement: new section |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
As it stands right now, a number of sections are long and list-like and feature a level of detail beyond what is called for in an encyclopedic space. In particular, I suggest that the Major Themes section could be deleted or substantially pared down. Similarly the Characters section could be substantially streamlined.[[User:Magic1million|Magic1million]] ([[User talk:Magic1million|talk]]) 07:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
As it stands right now, a number of sections are long and list-like and feature a level of detail beyond what is called for in an encyclopedic space. In particular, I suggest that the Major Themes section could be deleted or substantially pared down. Similarly the Characters section could be substantially streamlined.[[User:Magic1million|Magic1million]] ([[User talk:Magic1million|talk]]) 07:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Areas for improvement == |
|||
I would personally suggest that the article as a whole suffers more from being written like an advertisement than it does from spelling and grammar errors, and the maintenance message should be changed accordingly. |
Revision as of 13:41, 22 May 2017
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conchatys= ?
Doing some Google searching, I suspect that the Conchatys mentioned in the novel are what is now known as the Coushatta; accordingly, I linked to that entry. But can someone with more familiarity with this topic verify that the equation is correct?
Sections to Delete or Substantially Trim
As it stands right now, a number of sections are long and list-like and feature a level of detail beyond what is called for in an encyclopedic space. In particular, I suggest that the Major Themes section could be deleted or substantially pared down. Similarly the Characters section could be substantially streamlined.Magic1million (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Areas for improvement
I would personally suggest that the article as a whole suffers more from being written like an advertisement than it does from spelling and grammar errors, and the maintenance message should be changed accordingly.
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Novel has incomplete Book infobox
- Novel has infobox needing cover
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Unknown-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles