Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:12, 4 June 2017

Bertrand101

Bertrand101 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101/Archive/1

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

2 June 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

50.67.141.33 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
112.68.131.222 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

Sockpuppets that mainly edits articles of Korean dramas and artists, and also spams messages to other users. The first one above (IP sock 50.67.141.33) misleadingly requested to a User:Explicit 1 2 to semi-protect two Korean drama pages (Love in the Moonlight 3 4 and The Emperor: Owner of the Mask 5 6) and revert all my edits by keeping re-adding the "Philippine Reception" vandalism and "International broadcast" section at Love in the Moonlight page. In addition, the sockpuppet has plagiarized my edit summary of WP:NOTTVGUIDE rule as he already copy-pasted 7 and applied it on creating user accounts (like Wiki is not a TV Guide, Not TV Guide, Dealslays, Milsedgar, Decalriles, etc.) resulting in persistently abusing edits and getting blocked. -112.198.73.9 (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Check declined by a checkuser - Sorry, but CheckUser cannot link named accounts to IPs. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 14:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The two IPs are unlikely. They geolocate to opposite sides of the world. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 June 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

DZXE (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
180.190.115.105 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

Per article. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 00:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding IP 180.190.115.105 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) in SPI report. IP was seen editing the Taste Buddies article as described in Bertrand101's LTA. (See (1). -WayKurat (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

DZXE is Confirmed, and all socks on this account's range are blocked. —DoRD (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 June 2017

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

183.108.71.76 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

This sockpuppet is the same one that has been blocked (was also using a username that is similar to mine). It's a sockpuppet that mainly edits articles of Korean dramas and artists, and also spams messages to other users. He wrote a message on my talk page about a problem that it caused and was banned for. If he was not that person he would not know about it since it happened days ago and he his account was created today. His message: "Hello! Please refrain on putting alternate show names in infoboxes of Korean dramas. As you can see, like in "The Emperor: Owner of the Mask," the literal title "Ruler - Master of the Mask" is already in the lead paragraph as its literal title. Putting it again in the infobox (with a colon, not a hyphen) is not just redundancy or duplication but just makes the page conflicting. Alternative titles only apply on entirely different show names from it's literal Hangul trans name. It is for the best to remove the alternate show name and simply italicized the literal title in the lead paragraph (beside the Hangul title). Thank you. 183.108.71.76 (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)"

He kept removed a title which is different and should not be removed and was banned twice for that. It's not even me who was re-adding the alternative title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hessa94 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding IP address User:46.237.104.190 who removes titles from Korean drama pages, and even leave messages on other users' talk page to ask them to do it. Likely because it's a new account and both edits made so far [1] are linked to the issue stated above.Xdeluna (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad that it's declined. That IP Sock 183.108.71.76 is using the words "redundant", "unnecessary" and "paragraph" just like its sockpuppets. -112.198.73.9 (talk) 03:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Check declined by a checkuser We do not publicly link IPs with named accounts. Katie^talk 13:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2017

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

DZDI (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

Created page --⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 02:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Confirmed. No sleepers immediately visible. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 02:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2017

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

121.219.136.184 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

121.219.136.184 re-added the Vandalized "International Broadcast" Sections at the pages The Legend of the Blue Sea 1 and Guardian: The Lonely and Great God 2 with comments like "It's not a TV guide, read the guidelines properly before you make edits like this.". The IP sock reverted my removal of "International Broadcast" sections with harsh accusations like "How rude, I'm not a blocked IP user! I'm from Australia do you even know where that blocked user comes from? Stop making things up!" and "How rude! Do not make up such allegations, unruly IP user! I'm from Australia not the Philippines so stop trying to claim I'm a blocked Filipino user!". The IP sock even blanked his own talk page, claiming that "he came from Australia."

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I don't know how someone can claim I'm a sockpuppet just because I reverted their edits. I suppose the Materialscientist (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet as well because they made the same edit as me. I come from Australia not the Philippines. Stop making things up about me, how can you come to such a conclusion based on two of my edits? This is absurd! (121.219.136.184 (talk) 06:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 ====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
 <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
+* I don't know how someone can claim I'm a sockpuppet just because I reverted their edits. I suppose the {{user|Materialscientist}} is a sockpuppet as well because they made the same edit as me. I come from [http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/121.219.136.184 Australia] not the Philippines. Stop making things up about me, how can you come to such a conclusion based on two of my edits? This is absurd! ([[Special:Contributions/121.219.136.184|121.219.136.184]] ([[User talk:121.219.136.184|talk]]) 06:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC))
 ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====