Talk:Reason Rally: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎cat: new section
Line 5: Line 5:
:Good idea. Regards,[[User:Jeff5102|Jeff5102]] ([[User talk:Jeff5102|talk]]) 09:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
:Good idea. Regards,[[User:Jeff5102|Jeff5102]] ([[User talk:Jeff5102|talk]]) 09:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
::I don't see any objections in either of the talk pages... The 2016 article brings nothing new to merit its own article. (comment in merge section for both talk pages)--[[User:Fjmustak|Fjmustak]] ([[User talk:Fjmustak|talk]]) 13:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
::I don't see any objections in either of the talk pages... The 2016 article brings nothing new to merit its own article. (comment in merge section for both talk pages)--[[User:Fjmustak|Fjmustak]] ([[User talk:Fjmustak|talk]]) 13:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

== cat ==

This isnt really the type of page that is meant for the cat.[[User:Apollo The Logician|Apollo The Logician]] ([[User talk:Apollo The Logician|talk]]) 16:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:06, 11 August 2017

Soft redirect to:Talk:Reason Rally (2012)
This page is a soft redirect.

Merge Discussion

There is no reason why these need to be separated out. CPAC is multi year but it never does this. We would need an admin to do a quick splice (not necessarily a good one) to preserve editing history. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 15:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to merging the articles, if that is the consensus. Valerius Tygart (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any objections in either of the talk pages... The 2016 article brings nothing new to merit its own article. (comment in merge section for both talk pages)--Fjmustak (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

cat

This isnt really the type of page that is meant for the cat.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]