User talk:Xcuref1endx: Difference between revisions
Xcuref1endx (talk | contribs) |
Xcuref1endx (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/6&oldid=750545473 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/6&oldid=750545473 --> |
||
== Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article == |
|||
I noticed that you've deleted content from articles a number of times recently because it is "unnotable" or "not notable". Please be aware that [[WP:NNC|Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article]]. There is no simple rule for what goes and what stays in an article, but if something is factual and well-sourced, then generally [[WP:editing policy|editing policy]] applies, so the suggestions there, at [[WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM]], are a decent guide for article content that appears to have something wrong with it. --[[User:Dennis Bratland|Dennis Bratland]] ([[User talk:Dennis Bratland|talk]]) 00:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:Started a section in the talk page. It is certainly not well-sourced, but I laid out my position there. -[[User:Xcuref1endx|Xcuref1endx]] ([[User talk:Xcuref1endx#top|talk]]) 21:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:35, 27 August 2017
|
|
Abi Ann
Hi Xcuref1endx! Could you please help me understand why you reverted my recent edit on Abi Ann? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I just took a look at it again and now I am not sure, I must have misread the edit. Go ahead and revert it. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I'm sorry for my revert at Talk:Yolandi Visser. You were right. I was wrong. 
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vikings, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Caution for removing properly sourced content, with a misleading edit summary to boot. Thomas.W talk 14:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- I did provide a reason in the edit summary section. The content is not backed up by reliable secondary sources. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Xcuref1endx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)