User talk:Two.25.45.251

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Two.25.45.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have never edited in any way except productively and well. I am truly fed up of the absurd attacks on me which started when I got blocked with a false accusation of vandalism. I. Have. Never. Vandalised. Anything. OK? Two.25.45.251 (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are not blocked because of vandalism. You are blocked because you are believed to be Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. You have not addressed this in your unblock request, so there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Note that I strongly recommend WP:UTRS if you wish to address those concerns. Your case is substantially complicated and an unblock request is beyond the capability of most adminstrators to thoroughly investigate. Yamla (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Two.25.45.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not that person. There are no grounds to believe I am. I have only ever made good edits. Right now, I am merely trying to defend myself against lies, but it seems you want to be free to lie about me as you please. It's unbelievably tiresome and ridiculous to see good editing treated in this way. Note that:

I was blocked for vandalism; blocked for complaining about being blocked; blocked for redoing good edits; unblocked after an utterly absurd faff;

blocked again by wheel warring administrators on spurious grounds. All for making good edits. Two.25.45.251 (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not that person. There are no grounds to believe I am. I have only ever made good edits. Right now, I am merely trying to defend myself against lies, but it seems you want to be free to lie about me as you please. It's unbelievably tiresome and ridiculous to see good editing treated in this way. Note that: I was blocked for vandalism; blocked for complaining about being blocked; blocked for redoing good edits; unblocked after an utterly absurd faff; blocked again by wheel warring administrators on spurious grounds. All for making good edits. [[User:Two.25.45.251|Two.25.45.251]] ([[User talk:Two.25.45.251#top|talk]]) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not that person. There are no grounds to believe I am. I have only ever made good edits. Right now, I am merely trying to defend myself against lies, but it seems you want to be free to lie about me as you please. It's unbelievably tiresome and ridiculous to see good editing treated in this way. Note that: I was blocked for vandalism; blocked for complaining about being blocked; blocked for redoing good edits; unblocked after an utterly absurd faff; blocked again by wheel warring administrators on spurious grounds. All for making good edits. [[User:Two.25.45.251|Two.25.45.251]] ([[User talk:Two.25.45.251#top|talk]]) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not that person. There are no grounds to believe I am. I have only ever made good edits. Right now, I am merely trying to defend myself against lies, but it seems you want to be free to lie about me as you please. It's unbelievably tiresome and ridiculous to see good editing treated in this way. Note that: I was blocked for vandalism; blocked for complaining about being blocked; blocked for redoing good edits; unblocked after an utterly absurd faff; blocked again by wheel warring administrators on spurious grounds. All for making good edits. [[User:Two.25.45.251|Two.25.45.251]] ([[User talk:Two.25.45.251#top|talk]]) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}