Jump to content

Interpal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
KolbertBot (talk | contribs)
Rescuing 7 sources and tagging 6 as dead. #IABot (v1.5.2)
Line 27: Line 27:
'''Interpal''' is the working name for the British [[charitable organization|charity]] '''Palestinian Relief and Development Fund''' founded in 1994 which states that it is a non-political charity to alleviate problems faced by [[Palestinians]], and focused solely on the provision of relief and development aid to the poor and needy Palestinians the world over, but primarily in the [[Palestinian territories]], [[Lebanon]] and [[Jordan]].
'''Interpal''' is the working name for the British [[charitable organization|charity]] '''Palestinian Relief and Development Fund''' founded in 1994 which states that it is a non-political charity to alleviate problems faced by [[Palestinians]], and focused solely on the provision of relief and development aid to the poor and needy Palestinians the world over, but primarily in the [[Palestinian territories]], [[Lebanon]] and [[Jordan]].


The US government has made allegations that Interpal is funding or supporting terrorism, but these have not been substantiated in the British courts or by the [[Charity Commission for England and Wales|Charity Commission]]. United States citizens and permanent residents are however prohibited from doing business with them via a 2003 [[Office of Foreign Assets Control#Specially Designated Nationals List|SDN listing]].<ref>[http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/terror.pdf Designated on 08-21-03, Interpal] US Department of the Treasury.</ref>
The US government has made allegations that Interpal is funding or supporting terrorism, but these have not been substantiated in the British courts or by the [[Charity Commission for England and Wales|Charity Commission]]. United States citizens and permanent residents are however prohibited from doing business with them via a 2003 [[Office of Foreign Assets Control#Specially Designated Nationals List|SDN listing]].<ref>[http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/terror.pdf Designated on 08-21-03, Interpal] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130228090201/http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/terror.pdf |date=2013-02-28 }} US Department of the Treasury.</ref>
The British [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] found it is libellous in July 2010 to state that Interpal supported [[Hamas]].<ref name=guardian-20110113>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/jan/13/express-newspapers-medialaw |title=Catalogue of legal pay-outs that shames Express Newspapers |author=Roy Greenslade |newspaper=The Guardian |date=13 January 2011 |accessdate=29 December 2015}}</ref><ref name=pg-20100722>{{cite news |url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=45745 |title=Express pays out £60k over charity terrorism-links claim |author=Dominic Ponsford |newspaper=Press Gazette |date=22 July 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111025054552/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=45745 |archivedate=25 October 2011}}</ref>
The British [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] found it is libellous in July 2010 to state that Interpal supported [[Hamas]].<ref name=guardian-20110113>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/jan/13/express-newspapers-medialaw |title=Catalogue of legal pay-outs that shames Express Newspapers |author=Roy Greenslade |newspaper=The Guardian |date=13 January 2011 |accessdate=29 December 2015}}</ref><ref name=pg-20100722>{{cite news |url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=45745 |title=Express pays out £60k over charity terrorism-links claim |author=Dominic Ponsford |newspaper=Press Gazette |date=22 July 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111025054552/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=45745 |archivedate=25 October 2011}}</ref>


==Mission and values==
==Mission and values==
Interpal was founded in the wake of the [[Oslo Accords]]. It states that its “passion for justice and the preservation of human dignity commits [it] to helping Palestinians in need”.<ref name="Interpal - About Us">{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.org/Content.aspx?page_key=about_us&lang=en |title=Interpal - About Us |accessdate=2012-01-02}}</ref> Interpal works closely with their partners in Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, with the aim of “moving the poor and needy in its areas of operation away from the culture of dependency and encourage a culture of self-sufficiency, and to promote peace and stability within the communities to which the beneficiaries belong”.<ref name="Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012">{{cite web|url=http://www.iugaza.edu.ps/ar/UnitUpload/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%87%D8%AF/%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%AC/%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA/Mahmoud%20Lubbad%20-%20Graduation%20Research.pdf|title=Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012|author=Mahmoud O. Lubbad|publisher=Islamic University of Gaza - Community Development Institute|date=February 2011|location=p. 7}}</ref>
Interpal was founded in the wake of the [[Oslo Accords]]. It states that its “passion for justice and the preservation of human dignity commits [it] to helping Palestinians in need”.<ref name="Interpal - About Us">{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.org/Content.aspx?page_key=about_us&lang=en |title=Interpal - About Us |accessdate=2012-01-02 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Interpal works closely with their partners in Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, with the aim of “moving the poor and needy in its areas of operation away from the culture of dependency and encourage a culture of self-sufficiency, and to promote peace and stability within the communities to which the beneficiaries belong”.<ref name="Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012">{{cite web|url=http://www.iugaza.edu.ps/ar/UnitUpload/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%87%D8%AF/%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%AC/%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA/Mahmoud%20Lubbad%20-%20Graduation%20Research.pdf|title=Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012|author=Mahmoud O. Lubbad|publisher=Islamic University of Gaza - Community Development Institute|date=February 2011|location=p. 7}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


On their website, Interpal acknowledge that the volatile situation in the [[Palestinian Territories|occupied territories]] means it is most effective for the organisation to transfer funds to local authorised partners and allow goods and supplies to be purchased within the area. In the past, however, this has led to accusations of Interpal funds reaching illegal and terrorist organisations. (''[[Interpal#Allegations against Interpal|See below]]'').
On their website, Interpal acknowledge that the volatile situation in the [[Palestinian Territories|occupied territories]] means it is most effective for the organisation to transfer funds to local authorised partners and allow goods and supplies to be purchased within the area. In the past, however, this has led to accusations of Interpal funds reaching illegal and terrorist organisations. (''[[Interpal#Allegations against Interpal|See below]]'').
Line 46: Line 46:
3) '''Educational Support''': Interpal dedicates significant attention and funds to keeping children and young adults in education as part of their commitment to educating and empowering individuals in Palestine. This involves financial assistance to schools and universities as well as support for the neediest of pupils.
3) '''Educational Support''': Interpal dedicates significant attention and funds to keeping children and young adults in education as part of their commitment to educating and empowering individuals in Palestine. This involves financial assistance to schools and universities as well as support for the neediest of pupils.


4) '''Community Development''': Interpal state that self-sufficiency is key to alleviating poverty and fostering community development; they support orphanages, welfare centres and the protection of sites of religious and cultural significance to aid the creation of a sustainable Palestinian community.<ref name="Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012"/><ref name="Interpal - Our Work">{{cite web|url=http://www.interpal.org/Content.aspx?page_key=interpal_work&lang=en|title=Interpal - Our Work|accessdate=2012-01-29}}</ref>
4) '''Community Development''': Interpal state that self-sufficiency is key to alleviating poverty and fostering community development; they support orphanages, welfare centres and the protection of sites of religious and cultural significance to aid the creation of a sustainable Palestinian community.<ref name="Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012"/><ref name="Interpal - Our Work">{{cite web|url=http://www.interpal.org/Content.aspx?page_key=interpal_work&lang=en|title=Interpal - Our Work|accessdate=2012-01-29}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


==Fundraising==
==Fundraising==
Line 80: Line 80:


===2006 to 2009 inquiry===
===2006 to 2009 inquiry===
In July 2006 the [[BBC]] broadcast a ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'' programme, "Faith, Hate and Charity", alleging that Interpal donated funds to voluntary organisations in the Palestinian territories that supported the ideology of Hamas.<ref name=thirdsector-20060802>{{cite news |url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/618884/commission-review-interpal-investigation/ |title=Commission to review Interpal investigation |publisher=Third Sector Online |date=2 August 2006 |accessdate=5 August 2010}}</ref>
In July 2006 the [[BBC]] broadcast a ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'' programme, "Faith, Hate and Charity", alleging that Interpal donated funds to voluntary organisations in the Palestinian territories that supported the ideology of Hamas.<ref name=thirdsector-20060802>{{cite news |url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/618884/commission-review-interpal-investigation/ |title=Commission to review Interpal investigation |publisher=Third Sector Online |date=2 August 2006 |accessdate=5 August 2010 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718044450/http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/618884/commission-review-interpal-investigation/ |archivedate=18 July 2011 |df= }}</ref>


The head of the Charity Commission said on the ''Panorama'' programme that the presenting journalist had raised some "pertinent" issues concerning the organisation's links to Hamas that should be investigated. On 4 January 2007 the Commission "reiterated its 1996 conclusion that Interpal is 'a well run and committed organisation which carries out important work in a part of the world where there is great hardship and suffering'."<ref>{{Cite document|url=http://www.interpal.org/news/Interpal_And_The_Charity_Commission.html |title=Interpal and the Charity Commission|date=4 January 2007|publisher=Interpal|accessdate=2 February 2007 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070202202121/http://www.interpal.org/news/Interpal_And_The_Charity_Commission.html |archivedate = 2 February 2007}}</ref>
The head of the Charity Commission said on the ''Panorama'' programme that the presenting journalist had raised some "pertinent" issues concerning the organisation's links to Hamas that should be investigated. On 4 January 2007 the Commission "reiterated its 1996 conclusion that Interpal is 'a well run and committed organisation which carries out important work in a part of the world where there is great hardship and suffering'."<ref>{{Cite document|url=http://www.interpal.org/news/Interpal_And_The_Charity_Commission.html |title=Interpal and the Charity Commission|date=4 January 2007|publisher=Interpal|accessdate=2 February 2007 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070202202121/http://www.interpal.org/news/Interpal_And_The_Charity_Commission.html |archivedate = 2 February 2007}}</ref>


After an extended investigation, in February 2009 the Charity Commission report<ref name=cc-report-2009>{{cite report |url=http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk/NewsAttachments/NST/interpal09.pdf |title=Inquiry Report - Palestinian Relief and Development Fund (Interpal) |publisher=Charity Commission |date=26 February 2009 |accessdate=5 August 2010}}</ref> dismissed allegations by ''Panorama'' that Interpal was funding organisations involved in terrorism.<ref name=thirdsector-20090227>{{cite news |url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/886144/Interpal-not-fund-terrorist-groups/ |title=Interpal did not fund terrorist groups |author=Paul Jump |publisher=Third Sector Online |date=27 February 2009 |accessdate=5 August 2010}}</ref> Again the U.S. Treasury did not supply any evidence to the Charity Commission inquiry, though the Israeli government did provide an outline of its concerns.<ref name=cc-report-2009 /> However the inquiry concluded that Interpal “had not put in place adequate due diligence and monitoring procedures to be satisfied that these organisations were not promoting terrorist ideologies or activities. Where procedures were in place, they were not sufficient nor fully implemented”. The inquiry concluded that they "could not verify that the material it examined suggesting certain partner organisations funded by the charity may be promoting terrorist ideology or activities."<ref name=cc-report-2009 />
After an extended investigation, in February 2009 the Charity Commission report<ref name=cc-report-2009>{{cite report |url=http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk/NewsAttachments/NST/interpal09.pdf |title=Inquiry Report - Palestinian Relief and Development Fund (Interpal) |publisher=Charity Commission |date=26 February 2009 |accessdate=5 August 2010}}</ref> dismissed allegations by ''Panorama'' that Interpal was funding organisations involved in terrorism.<ref name=thirdsector-20090227>{{cite news |url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/886144/Interpal-not-fund-terrorist-groups/ |title=Interpal did not fund terrorist groups |author=Paul Jump |publisher=Third Sector Online |date=27 February 2009 |accessdate=5 August 2010 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718044411/http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/886144/Interpal-not-fund-terrorist-groups/ |archivedate=18 July 2011 |df= }}</ref> Again the U.S. Treasury did not supply any evidence to the Charity Commission inquiry, though the Israeli government did provide an outline of its concerns.<ref name=cc-report-2009 /> However the inquiry concluded that Interpal “had not put in place adequate due diligence and monitoring procedures to be satisfied that these organisations were not promoting terrorist ideologies or activities. Where procedures were in place, they were not sufficient nor fully implemented”. The inquiry concluded that they "could not verify that the material it examined suggesting certain partner organisations funded by the charity may be promoting terrorist ideology or activities."<ref name=cc-report-2009 />


Interpal has been ordered by the Charity Commission to end its links to [[The Union of Good]], which had been designated by the [[U.S. Treasury]] as “an organisation created by Hamas leadership to transfer funds to the terrorist organisation.”<ref>Interpal "had not adequately managed the charity’s relationship with the organisation the Union for Good. The Inquiry concluded that the charity’s continued membership of the Union for Good was not appropriate for a number of reasons set out in the report, including the involvement of designated entities in projects co-ordinated through the Union for Good, that designated entities had been amongst the Union for Good’s membership, and that one of the charity’s trustees was closely linked to the organisation. (Paragraphs 69–114)
Interpal has been ordered by the Charity Commission to end its links to [[The Union of Good]], which had been designated by the [[U.S. Treasury]] as “an organisation created by Hamas leadership to transfer funds to the terrorist organisation.”<ref>Interpal "had not adequately managed the charity’s relationship with the organisation the Union for Good. The Inquiry concluded that the charity’s continued membership of the Union for Good was not appropriate for a number of reasons set out in the report, including the involvement of designated entities in projects co-ordinated through the Union for Good, that designated entities had been amongst the Union for Good’s membership, and that one of the charity’s trustees was closely linked to the organisation. (Paragraphs 69–114)
As a result of the inquiry, the Commission has used its statutory powers to direct Interpal’s trustees to review their due diligence and monitoring procedures relating to their partner organisations, end the charity’s relationship with the Union for Good and ensure that no trustee holds office or has a role within the Union for Good. The Commission will be reviewing with the trustees the implementation of these requirements."</ref> In May 2010 the Charity Commission found Interpal to be in full compliance with directions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/archives/3098 |title=Interpal in Full Compliance |date=28 May 2010 |publisher=Interpal |accessdate=5 August 2010}}</ref>
As a result of the inquiry, the Commission has used its statutory powers to direct Interpal’s trustees to review their due diligence and monitoring procedures relating to their partner organisations, end the charity’s relationship with the Union for Good and ensure that no trustee holds office or has a role within the Union for Good. The Commission will be reviewing with the trustees the implementation of these requirements."</ref> In May 2010 the Charity Commission found Interpal to be in full compliance with directions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/archives/3098 |title=Interpal in Full Compliance |date=28 May 2010 |publisher=Interpal |accessdate=5 August 2010 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


===2012 inquiry===
===2012 inquiry===
Line 101: Line 101:
* Interpal was being investigated in Australia as of September 2008<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4678151.ece | work=The Times | location=London | title=George Galloways charity Interpal back under police glare | first=Richard | last=Kerbaj | date=5 September 2008 | accessdate=5 May 2010}}</ref> for its alleged links with [[Hamas]].
* Interpal was being investigated in Australia as of September 2008<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4678151.ece | work=The Times | location=London | title=George Galloways charity Interpal back under police glare | first=Richard | last=Kerbaj | date=5 September 2008 | accessdate=5 May 2010}}</ref> for its alleged links with [[Hamas]].
* The [[Islamic Bank of Britain]] has been put under pressure from its clearing bank, [[Lloyds TSB]], been forced to cease all dealings with Interpal and will close the charity’s bank account as of 8 December 2008. IBB has expressed full support for Interpal. No explanation has been given for this action by Lloyds TSB.<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/facup/3778476/Kettering-Town-chairman-to-return-award-as-bank-shuns-shirt-sponsors-accounts.html Kettering Town chairman to return award as bank shuns shirt sponsor's accounts], [[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]], 16 December 2008.</ref>
* The [[Islamic Bank of Britain]] has been put under pressure from its clearing bank, [[Lloyds TSB]], been forced to cease all dealings with Interpal and will close the charity’s bank account as of 8 December 2008. IBB has expressed full support for Interpal. No explanation has been given for this action by Lloyds TSB.<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/facup/3778476/Kettering-Town-chairman-to-return-award-as-bank-shuns-shirt-sponsors-accounts.html Kettering Town chairman to return award as bank shuns shirt sponsor's accounts], [[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]], 16 December 2008.</ref>
* On 22 July 2010, Interpal’s lawyers, [[Carter-Ruck]] issued a press release to mark the close of the charity’s libel case against the ''[[Sunday Express]]''. A statement read in the [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] before [[Mr. Justice Eady]] confirmed the paper’s acceptance that the allegations it made that Interpal supported Hamas were false, to make an apology, and to pay Interpal £60,000 plus legal costs in settlement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/interpal_-press-release-200710.pdf |title=Express Newspapers apologises and pays £60,000 to the Trustees of Interpal over untrue allegations of support for Hamas and terrorism |date=22 July 2010 |publisher=Carter-Ruck |id=SRA No. 44769 |accessdate=4 August 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/archives/3242 |title=Outcome of libel case |date=22 July 2010 |publisher=Interpal |accessdate=4 August 2010}}</ref>
* On 22 July 2010, Interpal’s lawyers, [[Carter-Ruck]] issued a press release to mark the close of the charity’s libel case against the ''[[Sunday Express]]''. A statement read in the [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] before [[Mr. Justice Eady]] confirmed the paper’s acceptance that the allegations it made that Interpal supported Hamas were false, to make an apology, and to pay Interpal £60,000 plus legal costs in settlement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/interpal_-press-release-200710.pdf |title=Express Newspapers apologises and pays £60,000 to the Trustees of Interpal over untrue allegations of support for Hamas and terrorism |date=22 July 2010 |publisher=Carter-Ruck |id=SRA No. 44769 |accessdate=4 August 2010 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpal.info/archives/3242 |title=Outcome of libel case |date=22 July 2010 |publisher=Interpal |accessdate=4 August 2010 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
On February 8, 2015 an article posted on ''The Telegraph'' featured a public appearance of Essam Mustafa and Ismail Haniyeh. The article claimed that the building hosting Interpal, Pinnacle House, in West London, along with [[Westgate House, Newcastle upon Tyne|Westgate House]]{{disambiguation needed|date=November 2016}}<!--In London, according to the citation--> and [[Crown House]]{{disambiguation needed|date=November 2016}}, constitute “main hubs for the Brotherhood’s operations in Europe.”<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title = How the Muslim Brotherhood fits into a network of extremism|url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/11398538/How-the-Muslim-Brotherhood-fits-into-a-network-of-extremism.html|website = Telegraph.co.uk|accessdate = 2016-01-05}}</ref>
On February 8, 2015 an article posted on ''The Telegraph'' featured a public appearance of Essam Mustafa and Ismail Haniyeh. The article claimed that the building hosting Interpal, Pinnacle House, in West London, along with [[Westgate House, Newcastle upon Tyne|Westgate House]]{{disambiguation needed|date=November 2016}}<!--In London, according to the citation--> and [[Crown House]]{{disambiguation needed|date=November 2016}}, constitute “main hubs for the Brotherhood’s operations in Europe.”<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title = How the Muslim Brotherhood fits into a network of extremism|url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/11398538/How-the-Muslim-Brotherhood-fits-into-a-network-of-extremism.html|website = Telegraph.co.uk|accessdate = 2016-01-05}}</ref>


Line 115: Line 115:
* [http://www.interpal.org/ Interpal Website]
* [http://www.interpal.org/ Interpal Website]
*{{EW charity|1040094|Palestinians Relief and Development Fund}}
*{{EW charity|1040094|Palestinians Relief and Development Fund}}
*[http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js672.htm US Designates Five Charities Funding Hamas], including Interpal
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060123024559/https://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js672.htm US Designates Five Charities Funding Hamas], including Interpal
*[http://www.bond.org.uk/sector/gsd/interpal.htm Bond: advocacy for interpal]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20061017175158/http://www.bond.org.uk/sector/gsd/interpal.htm Bond: advocacy for interpal]
**[http://www.bond.org.uk/sector/gsd/gsdsymons2.htm Letter to Baroness Symons]
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20070928011542/http://www.bond.org.uk/sector/gsd/gsdsymons2.htm Letter to Baroness Symons]
* [http://www.epolitix.com/EN/Forums/INTERPAL/home.htm epolitix: Interpal ]
* [http://www.epolitix.com/EN/Forums/INTERPAL/home.htm epolitix: Interpal ]
* [http://www.ihrc.org.uk/show.php?id=1663 IHRC – Interpal ]
* [http://www.ihrc.org.uk/show.php?id=1663 IHRC – Interpal ]
Line 127: Line 127:
** [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5209466.stm (BBC – Panorama documentary ''Faith, hate and charity'']
** [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5209466.stm (BBC – Panorama documentary ''Faith, hate and charity'']
*** [http://www.iwitness.co.uk/comment/0806c-01.htm A rebuttal of Panorama's documentary]
*** [http://www.iwitness.co.uk/comment/0806c-01.htm A rebuttal of Panorama's documentary]
* [http://www.osamasaeed.org/osama/2006/01/no_investigatio.html Interpal have no case to answer, Rolled-up trousers blog]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20060626143153/http://www.osamasaeed.org/osama/2006/01/no_investigatio.html Interpal have no case to answer, Rolled-up trousers blog]


[[Category:Development charities based in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Development charities based in the United Kingdom]]

Revision as of 22:27, 17 September 2017

Interpal
FoundedNovember 1994
TypeHumanitarian
FocusMedical, Education and Community
Location
Area served
Palestine, Jordan and Lebanon[1]
MethodDirect Aid / Program Funding
Key people
Ibrahim Hewitt
Revenue
£5,335,082 (2010)
Websitewww.interpal.org

Interpal is the working name for the British charity Palestinian Relief and Development Fund founded in 1994 which states that it is a non-political charity to alleviate problems faced by Palestinians, and focused solely on the provision of relief and development aid to the poor and needy Palestinians the world over, but primarily in the Palestinian territories, Lebanon and Jordan.

The US government has made allegations that Interpal is funding or supporting terrorism, but these have not been substantiated in the British courts or by the Charity Commission. United States citizens and permanent residents are however prohibited from doing business with them via a 2003 SDN listing.[2] The British High Court found it is libellous in July 2010 to state that Interpal supported Hamas.[3][4]

Mission and values

Interpal was founded in the wake of the Oslo Accords. It states that its “passion for justice and the preservation of human dignity commits [it] to helping Palestinians in need”.[5] Interpal works closely with their partners in Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, with the aim of “moving the poor and needy in its areas of operation away from the culture of dependency and encourage a culture of self-sufficiency, and to promote peace and stability within the communities to which the beneficiaries belong”.[6]

On their website, Interpal acknowledge that the volatile situation in the occupied territories means it is most effective for the organisation to transfer funds to local authorised partners and allow goods and supplies to be purchased within the area. In the past, however, this has led to accusations of Interpal funds reaching illegal and terrorist organisations. (See below).

Work

Interpal works in the occupied Palestinian territories of Gaza and the West Bank as well as the refugee camps in Jordan and Lebanon. It conducts the majority of its work through partner organisations that are based locally to “provide aid and revitalise the local economy at the same time”.[6]

Interpal have four main areas of focus:

1) Emergency Humanitarian Aid: Interpal provide humanitarian assistance by delivering food, water, shelter, clothing and medical aid year round. They also run other schemes such as sponsorship of orphans and seasonal support during Ramadan and Qurbani periods of the Islamic year.

2) Medical Assistance: Support is provided to establish new health clinics and to improve existing facilities that are overstretched. Interpal also provides medical equipment and supplies to those in need.

3) Educational Support: Interpal dedicates significant attention and funds to keeping children and young adults in education as part of their commitment to educating and empowering individuals in Palestine. This involves financial assistance to schools and universities as well as support for the neediest of pupils.

4) Community Development: Interpal state that self-sufficiency is key to alleviating poverty and fostering community development; they support orphanages, welfare centres and the protection of sites of religious and cultural significance to aid the creation of a sustainable Palestinian community.[6][7]

Fundraising

The charity organises several events throughout the year including charity bazaars, university talks, auctions, and fundraising dinners. Other annual campaigns include Ramadan and Qurbani appeals.

Interpal has a number of successful fundraising channels in addition to its mail and online campaigns. Tens of thousands of people in the UK make a regular financial contribution towards its work and many thousands more sponsor orphans and needy children on a regular giving scheme. Vital funds are received from mosque and street collections and through live TV appeals. Interpal also receives funds in return for providing and organising volunteer stewards at events such as IslamExpo and the Global Peace & Unity events. As a seller of fair trade products, Interpal helps developing communities in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

Administration costs and policies

Interpals policy is not to deduct administration costs from specified donations. Administration costs for the past 7 years have been less than 10% of the total annual budget,[citation needed] and they are met from the following sources:

Allegations against Interpal

Interpal has on three occasions, following allegations, been the subject of investigations by the Charity Commission for England and Wales.[8] In all three investigations evidence was not found to prove alleged links between Interpal and organisations involved in terrorism.[9][10]

1996 inquiry

In 1996 allegations were made against Interpal and its Trustees in the Sunday Telegraph. A Charity Commission inquiry found no evidence that donations could not be accounted for or were made for political reasons.[11] Subsequently, the Telegraph issued the following apology and retraction on 29 November 1997:

"On 26 May 1996, in an article entitled "London fatwa backs suicide bombers", we suggested that the Palestinian Relief and Development Fund (INTERPAL) was run by Hamas activists who encourage and support terrorist activities in Israel. We also reported claims which were being investigated by the Charity Commission that INTERPAL was used to raise money to fund the training of suicide bombers in Gaza and the West Bank. We now accept that the Trustees of INTERPAL are not Hamas activists. We also accept that the Charity Commission's investigations found there to be no evidence of any pro-terrorist bias in the charity or of any channelling of its funds towards the training of suicide bombers. The Commission concluded that the charity is a "well run and committed organisation which carries out important work in a part of the world where there is great hardship and suffering" and that INTERPAL takes every possible step to ensure that its donations go only to charitable purposes, helping the poor and needy. We withdraw the allegations that appeared in our article and apologise to the Trustees of INTERPAL for the embarrassment caused."

2003 inquiry

On August 22, 2003 the United States Department of the Treasury published a list of six individuals and five charities it alleged to have links to Hamas and terrorism. The list included Interpal. It described all as "Specially Designated Global Terrorists." The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control put them all on a list of individuals and organisations with whom United States citizens and permanent residents are prohibited from doing business.[12] A few weeks later, after a full investigation, the British Charity Commission cleared Interpal of any illegal activities, finding the U.S. Treasury did not provide evidence to support their allegations, and unfroze its assets.[13][14]

After the Board of Deputies of British Jews repeated this allegation, it was sued by Interpal. The parties settled out of court,[15] with the Board of Deputies making a public apology and posting the statement on its website for 28 days. The statement on their Web-site concluded:

..We referred to “terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Interpal”. We would like to make it clear that we should not have described Interpal in this way and we regret the upset and distress our item caused.[16]

2006 to 2009 inquiry

In July 2006 the BBC broadcast a Panorama programme, "Faith, Hate and Charity", alleging that Interpal donated funds to voluntary organisations in the Palestinian territories that supported the ideology of Hamas.[17]

The head of the Charity Commission said on the Panorama programme that the presenting journalist had raised some "pertinent" issues concerning the organisation's links to Hamas that should be investigated. On 4 January 2007 the Commission "reiterated its 1996 conclusion that Interpal is 'a well run and committed organisation which carries out important work in a part of the world where there is great hardship and suffering'."[18]

After an extended investigation, in February 2009 the Charity Commission report[11] dismissed allegations by Panorama that Interpal was funding organisations involved in terrorism.[9] Again the U.S. Treasury did not supply any evidence to the Charity Commission inquiry, though the Israeli government did provide an outline of its concerns.[11] However the inquiry concluded that Interpal “had not put in place adequate due diligence and monitoring procedures to be satisfied that these organisations were not promoting terrorist ideologies or activities. Where procedures were in place, they were not sufficient nor fully implemented”. The inquiry concluded that they "could not verify that the material it examined suggesting certain partner organisations funded by the charity may be promoting terrorist ideology or activities."[11]

Interpal has been ordered by the Charity Commission to end its links to The Union of Good, which had been designated by the U.S. Treasury as “an organisation created by Hamas leadership to transfer funds to the terrorist organisation.”[19] In May 2010 the Charity Commission found Interpal to be in full compliance with directions.[20]

2012 inquiry

A supplemental report was issued in 2012 by the Charity Commission following the 2009 inquiry.[21] Interpal was reported to have complied with the requirements of the 2009 inquiry. Interpal was no longer a member of the Union for Good. The trustee linked to the Union for Good had resigned as General Secretary of that organisation. Although Interpal did have to request an extension of the deadline given by the Charity Commission, it had by June 2012 published a Partnership and Funding Operations Manual that set out procedures that would effectively address the failings reported in the 2009 inquiry. The Commission said that it was the responsibility of the trustees to continue to monitor the issues raised by the inquiry.

The media, banks and Interpal

  • On 6 January 2006 the Wall Street Journal reported that a suit was filed by an individual in the Brooklyn Federal Court in New York against the NatWest, part of the Royal Bank of Scotland for providing banking services to Interpal, claiming that the group has been identified as linked to terrorism. NatWest is hoping to have the charges, which it claims are spurious and absurd, dismissed.[citation needed]
  • On 15 January 2006 The Sunday Telegraph [22] reported that Zvi Heifetz, then Israel's ambassador to London, would hold urgent talks with Ivan Lewis, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury and a Vice-Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, in order to demand action be taken against Interpal after George Galloway entered the reality television show Celebrity Big Brother UK to earn money for his charity of choice, Interpal. Interpal reacted to the claims by issuing a statement saying "Regrettably, there are many who want to stop the little charitable support we give from actually getting to needy Palestinians. We believe we are targets of the Israeli and US governments purely because we are a Muslim-run charity".
  • On 2 July 2006, The Jerusalem Post also issued an apology to Interpal regarding a defamatory article it published.[23]
  • On 29 July 2006 the BBC Panorama programme investigated to find out how Interpal's donations have allegedly helped build support for Hamas, the elected government of the Palestinian people. It claimed that Interpal was funding organisations that proclaimed a "jihadist ideology", and that there were personal links between Interpal's chief trustee and Hamas figures.
  • On 20 March 2007 Interpal’s bank accounts with British bank NatWest/Royal Bank of Scotland were closed by the bank, which cited pressure from the US legal system as the reason. The suit, filed in the federal court in Brooklyn in January 2006, made claims on behalf of 15 families of Americans wounded in attacks. It said NatWest, owned by RBS, allowed Interpal to raise funds on its website knowing the US government identified the charity as a fundraiser for Hamas, violating US anti-terrorism laws.
  • Interpal was being investigated in Australia as of September 2008[24] for its alleged links with Hamas.
  • The Islamic Bank of Britain has been put under pressure from its clearing bank, Lloyds TSB, been forced to cease all dealings with Interpal and will close the charity’s bank account as of 8 December 2008. IBB has expressed full support for Interpal. No explanation has been given for this action by Lloyds TSB.[25]
  • On 22 July 2010, Interpal’s lawyers, Carter-Ruck issued a press release to mark the close of the charity’s libel case against the Sunday Express. A statement read in the High Court before Mr. Justice Eady confirmed the paper’s acceptance that the allegations it made that Interpal supported Hamas were false, to make an apology, and to pay Interpal £60,000 plus legal costs in settlement.[26][27]

On February 8, 2015 an article posted on The Telegraph featured a public appearance of Essam Mustafa and Ismail Haniyeh. The article claimed that the building hosting Interpal, Pinnacle House, in West London, along with Westgate House[disambiguation needed] and Crown House[disambiguation needed], constitute “main hubs for the Brotherhood’s operations in Europe.”[28]

A report released by the NEFA Foundation in 2009 adduces a series of court cases in Israel and the United States as further evidence of the connections between Interpal and Hamas.[29]

  • Mohammed Ali Hasan Al-Moyad, chair of Al-Aqsa in Yemen, was convicted in 2005 for his efforts to funnel money to Hamas and al-Qaida. According to a U.S. federal indictment, he provided receipts from Interpal and three other organizations as proof of his support of jihad at a meeting in 2002.[29][28][30]
  • In 2003 five individuals and two organizations were investigated in Israel. The basis of the investigation was evidence of funds received from Interpal and other organizations member of the Union of Good which were used to support Hamas activities.[29] The NEFA Foundation pointed out that “in a January 2005 plea agreement, the accused individuals acknowledged their guilt regarding these accusations.”[31][29]
  • In 2005 The Independent published an article reporting that a military court charged a Hamas activist with diverting £9 million from Interpal as well as from other charities based in the UK to support the families of suicide bombers and to fund terrorist operations.[29][32] The article specified that among the recipients of these funds was also the family of “a young man who blew himself up at the Sbarro pizza restaurant in Jerusalem in August 2001, killing 15 people and wounding 107”, an attack for which both Hamas and Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.[32]

References

  1. ^ "about us". Interpal.
  2. ^ Designated on 08-21-03, Interpal Archived 2013-02-28 at the Wayback Machine US Department of the Treasury.
  3. ^ Roy Greenslade (13 January 2011). "Catalogue of legal pay-outs that shames Express Newspapers". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
  4. ^ Dominic Ponsford (22 July 2010). "Express pays out £60k over charity terrorism-links claim". Press Gazette. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011.
  5. ^ "Interpal - About Us". Retrieved 2012-01-02.[permanent dead link]
  6. ^ a b c Mahmoud O. Lubbad (February 2011). "Proposed Plan for Ensuring the Most Effective use of Interpal's Funding in Gaza Strip for year 2012" (PDF). p. 7: Islamic University of Gaza - Community Development Institute.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)[permanent dead link]
  7. ^ "Interpal - Our Work". Retrieved 2012-01-29.[permanent dead link]
  8. ^ Niki May Young (27 July 2010). "Interpal wins High Court case against Sunday Express claims of terror links". Civil Society Media. Retrieved 19 August 2010.
  9. ^ a b Paul Jump (27 February 2009). "Interpal did not fund terrorist groups". Third Sector Online. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 5 August 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ "Commons Hansard, Column 772W, Interpal" (Document). Hansard. 6 Feb 2006. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |accessdate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
  11. ^ a b c d Inquiry Report - Palestinian Relief and Development Fund (Interpal) (PDF) (Report). Charity Commission. 26 February 2009. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  12. ^ "U.S. Designates Five Charities Funding Hamas and Six Senior Hamas Leaders as Terrorist Entities", United States Department of the Treasury, August 22, 2003.
  13. ^ Matthew Levitt, Dennis Ross, Hamas: Politics, Charity, And Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, Yale University Press, 2007, p. 158, ISBN 0300122586, 9780300122589
  14. ^ "Lords Hansard, Column 18, Interpal: Charitable Status". Hansard. 6 Oct 2003. Retrieved 24 March 2007.
  15. ^ Dominic Casciani, Islamic charity cleared of Hamas link, BBC, 24 September 2003.
  16. ^ Dominic Casciani, Top Jewish group 'terror' apology, BBC, 29 December 2005.
  17. ^ "Commission to review Interpal investigation". Third Sector Online. 2 August 2006. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 5 August 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ "Interpal and the Charity Commission" (Document). Interpal. 4 January 2007. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |accessdate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |archivedate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |archiveurl= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
  19. ^ Interpal "had not adequately managed the charity’s relationship with the organisation the Union for Good. The Inquiry concluded that the charity’s continued membership of the Union for Good was not appropriate for a number of reasons set out in the report, including the involvement of designated entities in projects co-ordinated through the Union for Good, that designated entities had been amongst the Union for Good’s membership, and that one of the charity’s trustees was closely linked to the organisation. (Paragraphs 69–114) As a result of the inquiry, the Commission has used its statutory powers to direct Interpal’s trustees to review their due diligence and monitoring procedures relating to their partner organisations, end the charity’s relationship with the Union for Good and ensure that no trustee holds office or has a role within the Union for Good. The Commission will be reviewing with the trustees the implementation of these requirements."
  20. ^ "Interpal in Full Compliance". Interpal. 28 May 2010. Retrieved 5 August 2010.[permanent dead link]
  21. ^ http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120816224444/http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Library/interpal_supplementary.pdf
  22. ^ Melissa Kite and Patrick Hennessy,"Government urged to ban Galloway's Big Brother charity",The Telegraph, 15 January 2006
  23. ^ "Correction/Apology: Interpal". The Jerusalem Post. 2 July 2006.[dead link]
  24. ^ Kerbaj, Richard (5 September 2008). "George Galloways charity Interpal back under police glare". The Times. London. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  25. ^ Kettering Town chairman to return award as bank shuns shirt sponsor's accounts, The Telegraph, 16 December 2008.
  26. ^ "Express Newspapers apologises and pays £60,000 to the Trustees of Interpal over untrue allegations of support for Hamas and terrorism" (PDF). Carter-Ruck. 22 July 2010. SRA No. 44769. Retrieved 4 August 2010.[permanent dead link]
  27. ^ "Outcome of libel case". Interpal. 22 July 2010. Retrieved 4 August 2010.[permanent dead link]
  28. ^ a b "How the Muslim Brotherhood fits into a network of extremism". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 2016-01-05.
  29. ^ a b c d e Merley, Steve. (2009-03-23). "The Union of Good: INTERPAL and the U.K. Member Organizations". The NEFA Foundation - via GlobalMBWatch.com. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  30. ^ Statement of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales on the Al-Moayad and Zayed Convictions, DOJ Press Release, March 10, 2005.
  31. ^ The Haifa District Court P 000272/03 before his honour Court President Lindestrau, and Judges Y. Dar and A. Schiff. 2005-12-01.
  32. ^ a b "Charity cash for Palestinian poor was siphoned to suicide bombers". The Independent. Retrieved 2016-01-05.