Jump to content

User talk:The Rambling Man: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)
Line 12: Line 12:
::Thank you for agreeing. Since you recently made comments at [[List of accolades received by Velaiilla Pattadhari|''VIP'' awards]]' FLC, I thought you'd do the same here, considering they're in the same field. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Kailash29792|<font color = "black" ><b>Kailash29792</b></font>]] [[User talk:Kailash29792|<font color = "black" >(talk)</font>]] </span> 09:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
::Thank you for agreeing. Since you recently made comments at [[List of accolades received by Velaiilla Pattadhari|''VIP'' awards]]' FLC, I thought you'd do the same here, considering they're in the same field. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Kailash29792|<font color = "black" ><b>Kailash29792</b></font>]] [[User talk:Kailash29792|<font color = "black" >(talk)</font>]] </span> 09:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
:::Indeed I shall. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man#top|talk]]) 09:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
:::Indeed I shall. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man#top|talk]]) 09:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

== September 2017 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision&nbsp;and for violation of your [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The_Rambling_Man#The_Rambling_Man_prohibited|restriction]] ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The_Rambling_Man#September_2017|amended]]), you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the &#91;&#91;WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard&#93;&#93; or &#91;&#91;WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard&#93;&#93;. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/GorillaWarfare|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.&nbsp;[[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small> 23:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

Revision as of 23:12, 25 September 2017

Pending

It is currently a FLC. Would you like to post comments there? --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash29792 once I catch up with all the older ones, yes I'll comment there. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for agreeing. Since you recently made comments at VIP awards' FLC, I thought you'd do the same here, considering they're in the same field. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I shall. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violation of your restriction (amended), you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."