User talk:95.145.130.94: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Edit warring on Grenfell Tower fire. (TW) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Even if you are correct you cannot be utterly inconsistent and just change one instance of it and leave the dozens of other instances in all other AU election articles as-is. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 17:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
::Even if you are correct you cannot be utterly inconsistent and just change one instance of it and leave the dozens of other instances in all other AU election articles as-is. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 17:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::I am correct, and it's not my responsibility to fix everything. If articles are inconsistent, that is the fault of the people who didn't bother to read the MOS properly, like yourself. Your edit warring is now problematic. Time for a report. [[Special:Contributions/95.145.130.94|95.145.130.94]] ([[User talk:95.145.130.94#top|talk]]) 18:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
:::I am correct, and it's not my responsibility to fix everything. If articles are inconsistent, that is the fault of the people who didn't bother to read the MOS properly, like yourself. Your edit warring is now problematic. Time for a report. [[Special:Contributions/95.145.130.94|95.145.130.94]] ([[User talk:95.145.130.94#top|talk]]) 18:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== October 2017 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Grenfell Tower fire]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 14:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
Revision as of 14:35, 8 October 2017
Bolding of federal election is correct. See Australian federal election, 2004 and Australian federal election, 2010. Thanks and goodbye. Timeshift (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- It is not. See the WP:MOS. Stop undoing my corrections before it becomes vandalism. 95.145.130.94 (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Even if you are correct you cannot be utterly inconsistent and just change one instance of it and leave the dozens of other instances in all other AU election articles as-is. Timeshift (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am correct, and it's not my responsibility to fix everything. If articles are inconsistent, that is the fault of the people who didn't bother to read the MOS properly, like yourself. Your edit warring is now problematic. Time for a report. 95.145.130.94 (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Even if you are correct you cannot be utterly inconsistent and just change one instance of it and leave the dozens of other instances in all other AU election articles as-is. Timeshift (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)