Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Gildar

Daniel Gildar

Daniel Gildar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. Should have been speeded , but someone removed the CSD because "the article had sources." Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources. reddogsix (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

• Weak Keep - With some help, this article could potentially be rounded out. Seems to be notable in the local area, and with his international and music connections, it could be just a matter of putting in some elbow grease. - NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 15:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
• "Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources." - that would be me, and that would be because such an activity is for a debate here, not at CSD. See User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 and User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes. That somebody has not !voted delete justifies the reason for coming here. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

• Comment - Thanks for the clarification. Not sure I agree with your view. reddogsix (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Try being an admin and getting a "nice" message like "why did u delete my article u fascist" ;-) As for the actual notability, not sure - I can only find this one source and not a lot else. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

I'd use a LOL, but in reality it is not funny to get/put up with abuse in any situation. I did a WP:BEFORE prior to the CSD nomination and also found it to be lacking. My best to you.... reddogsix (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- fails WP:MUSIC not WP:ANYBIO written as WP:PROMO without relevant WP:CS--EC Racing (talk) 20:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)