User talk:Iryna Harpy

User Zocklandy

Hi Iryna. After your revers of edits by this user, he has beem making more of the same. I have dropped him messages on his talk page. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Rui Gabriel Correia, I'm a little tardy, but I'm responding on the article's talk page and reverting the user's latest round of edit warring now. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Geographical distribution

Thanks for your question. Please see main article ′Ukrainian diaspora′ XXI century. There are more one hundred and twenty countries. Sincerely, Yourreader

a reliable source

Hi, Iryna, you wrote to me: "you didn't provide a reliable source". I've provided reference to the Wiki article on Mikhail Epstein. Which other sources should be provided? Thank you, Markitin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markitin (talk • contribs) 21:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Unconstructive editing in Reconquista

Hi Iryna, hope you are doing well! As as follow-up to other edits in several articles, the IP editor 174.119 has made also a foray w unconstructive edits in Reconquista. S/he has been sufficiently warned, is there any way to stop by now this disruption quickly by an administrator? Best regards Iñaki LL (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Iñaki LL. I've added the article to my watchlist, and your latest reverts seem to be holding. It seems that this user is going OR and POV on a number of articles in the subject area of history. They've not been constructive, but there aren't enough edits in their history to do much other than keep an eye on their 'contributions'. There also hasn't been enough activity to suggest that it's a blocked user, so it may well just be a boorish newbie who thinks that their position on any given subject - and long-winded edit summaries about how wrong the content they're changing is - is good editing practice. I'm going to go AGF on this one and push them to use article talk pages and, most importantly, familiarise themselves with policies and guidelines. They'll A) get bored; B) might set up an account and try to learn the ropes; C) keep pushing and get blocked for not being HERE. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

I think I have met the editor before, his content approach is not something I can identify clearly w a certain profile, sometimes looks like another editor blocked, but it gives a bit of a headache anyway. Best, Iñaki LL (talk) 18:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

@Iñaki LL: Yes, it's frustrating. I'm also reminded of 2 blocked editors, but there isn't enough evidence yet. The tone of the edit summaries really makes me think it's one blocked editor in particular, but I wouldn't be able to tell unless he discussed something in more detail on one of the talk pages. Oh, well. As long as there's at least 2 of us watching, we'll be able to work it out if they keep editing... Best for now! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

• News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!

• Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables

• Humour: Guys named Ralph

• In focus: Offline Wikipedia developed at OFF.NETWORK Content Hackathon

• Blog: The future of offline access to Wikipedia: The Kiwix example

• In the media: Facebook and poetry

• Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK

• Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

What on earth you are talking about!?! Have I angered you somehow? Are you a Feminist or what? Whatever your reasons's are, please stop harassing me, OK? AI will stop editing Wikipedia anyways, too much stupidity. :)