Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Anthology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ce
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Weak keep''' It appears to be a bit soon, but I find the nomination problematic. The number of social media follows is irrelevant, and I do not want to see it used in AfDs to evaluate notability. I don't see any "self sources" in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miss_Anthology&oldid=807455118 version] that [[User:El cid, el campeador]] nominated for deletion. I'm not clear on what niche journalism is. Is orartswatch.org niche journalism because it covers the arts or local news because it only covers Oregon? The sourcing is not great, http://www.ksmoca.com/ksmoca-international-art-fair/ is a mere mention, http://littmanwhite.tumblr.com/post/165344872122/outside-of-the-lines-miss-anthology-september looks like a press release. On the other hand, http://www.orartswatch.org/miss-anthology-teaches-the-power-of-comics/ and http://news.streetroots.org/2017/09/08/miss-anthology-using-comics-create-change are sufficiently in-depth critical assessments to meet the requirements of the GNG. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 15:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' It appears to be a bit soon, but I find the nomination problematic. The number of social media follows is irrelevant, and I do not want to see it used in AfDs to evaluate notability. I don't see any "self sources" in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miss_Anthology&oldid=807455118 version] that [[User:El cid, el campeador]] nominated for deletion. I'm not clear on what niche journalism is. Is orartswatch.org niche journalism because it covers the arts or local news because it only covers Oregon? The sourcing is not great, http://www.ksmoca.com/ksmoca-international-art-fair/ is a mere mention, http://littmanwhite.tumblr.com/post/165344872122/outside-of-the-lines-miss-anthology-september looks like a press release. On the other hand, http://www.orartswatch.org/miss-anthology-teaches-the-power-of-comics/ and http://news.streetroots.org/2017/09/08/miss-anthology-using-comics-create-change are sufficiently in-depth critical assessments to meet the requirements of the GNG. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 15:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
::This doesn't warrant an actual response. There is nothing 'problematic' about nominating a page for deletion. Please stop. [[User:El cid, el campeador|<span style="color:black">'''‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:el cid, el campeador|<span style="color:teal">ᐐT₳LKᐬ</span>]]</sup> 15:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
::This doesn't warrant an actual response. There is nothing 'problematic' about nominating a page for deletion. Please stop. [[User:El cid, el campeador|<span style="color:black">'''‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:el cid, el campeador|<span style="color:teal">ᐐT₳LKᐬ</span>]]</sup> 15:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
:::'''Comment'''. "The sourcing is not great''... streetroots.org is not even a news reporting site, it's an advocacy site. That makes one site in total for RS: orartswatch.org. GNG is clearly not met.
:::'''Comment'''. As [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] says, "The sourcing is not great". The two sources stated to support keep are streetroots.org (not even a news reporting site, it's an advocacy site)and orartswatch.org. GNG is clearly not met by one reliable source.[[Special:Contributions/96.127.242.251|96.127.242.251]] ([[User talk:96.127.242.251|talk]]) 19:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 28 October 2017

Miss Anthology

Miss Anthology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an unnotable organization. Little or no coverage other than local, niche journalism and self sources. Not that it's an indicator, but social media all has under 200 followers/likes ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't warrant an actual response. There is nothing 'problematic' about nominating a page for deletion. Please stop. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. As Mduvekot says, "The sourcing is not great". The two sources stated to support keep are streetroots.org (not even a news reporting site, it's an advocacy site)and orartswatch.org. GNG is clearly not met by one reliable source.96.127.242.251 (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]